Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: “Game-Changing” Study Links Cellphone Radiation to Cancer [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(62,280 posts)11. adding a link
Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
Multiyear, peer-reviewed study found low incidences of two types of tumors in male rats exposed to type of radio frequencies commonly emitted by cellphones
By Ryan Knutson
ryan.knutson@wsj.com
@Ryan_Knutson
May 27, 2016 12:42 a.m. ET
A major U.S. government study on rats has found a link between cellphones and cancer, an explosive finding in the long-running debate about whether mobile phones cause health effects. ... The multiyear, peer-reviewed study, by the National Toxicology Program, found low incidences of two types of tumors in male rats that were exposed to the type of radio frequencies that are commonly emitted by cellphones. The tumors were gliomas, which are in the glial cells of the brain, and schwannomas of the heart.
Given the widespread global usage of mobile communications among users of all ages, even a very small increase in the incidence of disease resulting from exposure to [radio-frequency radiation] could have broad implications for public health, according to a report of partial findings from the study, which was released late Thursday.
A spokesperson for the National Institutes of Health, which helped oversee the study, wasnt immediately available for comment. Earlier in the week, the NIH said, It is important to note that previous human, observational data collected in earlier, large-scale population-based studies have found limited evidence of an increased risk for developing cancer from cellphone use.
While not all biological effects observed in animals necessarily apply to humans, the National Toxicology Programs $25 million study is one of the biggest and most comprehensive experiment into health effects from cellphones.
Multiyear, peer-reviewed study found low incidences of two types of tumors in male rats exposed to type of radio frequencies commonly emitted by cellphones
By Ryan Knutson
ryan.knutson@wsj.com
@Ryan_Knutson
May 27, 2016 12:42 a.m. ET
A major U.S. government study on rats has found a link between cellphones and cancer, an explosive finding in the long-running debate about whether mobile phones cause health effects. ... The multiyear, peer-reviewed study, by the National Toxicology Program, found low incidences of two types of tumors in male rats that were exposed to the type of radio frequencies that are commonly emitted by cellphones. The tumors were gliomas, which are in the glial cells of the brain, and schwannomas of the heart.
Given the widespread global usage of mobile communications among users of all ages, even a very small increase in the incidence of disease resulting from exposure to [radio-frequency radiation] could have broad implications for public health, according to a report of partial findings from the study, which was released late Thursday.
A spokesperson for the National Institutes of Health, which helped oversee the study, wasnt immediately available for comment. Earlier in the week, the NIH said, It is important to note that previous human, observational data collected in earlier, large-scale population-based studies have found limited evidence of an increased risk for developing cancer from cellphone use.
While not all biological effects observed in animals necessarily apply to humans, the National Toxicology Programs $25 million study is one of the biggest and most comprehensive experiment into health effects from cellphones.
The National Toxicology Program is holding a media briefing at noon today to discuss the results
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They probably won't have to give them up if the companies can improve the shielding
cstanleytech
May 2016
#4
Who knows, maybe they can redesign the antennas or use somthing like a bluetooth
cstanleytech
May 2016
#24
I would have to see an independant study done on them to see if they actually
cstanleytech
May 2016
#81
My fellow passengers on Metrorail and Metrobus must not have heard about this development. NT
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2016
#9
yes, I encourage all who read this to spend $5 to $15 to get a wired headset for your phone
GreatGazoo
May 2016
#48
I wear hearing aids in both ears. How am I supposed to use a headset or ear buds?
-none
May 2016
#103
Please share your source of $5-$15 wired headset- preferably comfortable (not buds) and
Kashkakat v.2.0
May 2016
#114
The National Toxicology Program is holding a media briefing at noon today to discuss the results
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2016
#12
Beat me to it, but I was going to make the 'how are they even supposed to fit in the building' joke.
AtheistCrusader
May 2016
#52
And cell phone corporations come out with never-before-heard-of scientist and science
fasttense
May 2016
#21
I don't think it will, read the study yourself, no biological significant effects for female rats...
Humanist_Activist
May 2016
#100
Your last sentence is where we fundamentally disagree. I take whatever evidence there is
Kashkakat v.2.0
May 2016
#115
My hunch is that this is a cumulative problem, more likely to harm those who grew up with cellphones
groundloop
May 2016
#25
My husband gave me a hard time when I made the SAR rating the #1 criteria for selecting a phone
Skwmom
May 2016
#26
Interesting correlation at end (where we would expect it). Need data newer than a decade old.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2016
#38
Way back in the 90's the cell phones transmitted with a lot more power than they do now.
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#43
I think the 600mhz spectrum just went up for, or is about to go up for auction.
AtheistCrusader
May 2016
#49
I was going to say, it drops at 2006. That's around the time the iPhone came into being.
C Moon
May 2016
#53
As I recall gliomas need a few years to get from a few cells to something that will be disruptive to
Jemmons
May 2016
#62
You have the requirements for relevance lined up the wrong way round. If and only if you can be sure
Jemmons
May 2016
#84
I wonder how much RF is being broadcast along all those big power lines bringing us the
jtuck004
May 2016
#39
I used to do that as well, and had noticed the reception wasn't near what it used to be.
jtuck004
May 2016
#69
The radiation level the rats received was "not very different" from what humans are exposed to ...
AlbertCat
May 2016
#44
Except they are much higher, distributed across the entire body, and were for 9 hours per day
Major Nikon
May 2016
#50
It's time to develop phone cases that shield the radiation from users. The phone industry should
Dont call me Shirley
May 2016
#73
Unfortunately, if you shield the user you'll also shield the cell tower (i.e. won't work)
groundloop
May 2016
#74
The rich will have the problem solved for themselves at our expense. :-/
Dont call me Shirley
May 2016
#108
woah causes Schwannomas'? They're usually benign but cause a lot of problems to nerves.
Sunlei
May 2016
#94
Good luck taking on Big Water. Their contributions to Congress fall like rain.
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2016
#105
Interesting, apparently it only effects male rats, as the study itself concludes....
Humanist_Activist
May 2016
#99
MEANWHILE... just try to find a functioning, well made & comfortable wired headset preferably
Kashkakat v.2.0
May 2016
#113
No, a rat study with marginal results does not prove that cell phones cause cancer,
GoneOffShore
May 2016
#122
So, if you have to use a smart phone, what would you consider a "best practices" to safeguard
WhoWoodaKnew
Jun 2016
#123