Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
9. This is a PR puff piece, not an investigative report.
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:12 AM
May 2016

I'm very disappointed in the low level of "journalism" and "reporting" of this article. The reporter cough-stenographer-cough basically repeats the release from the NRDC statement without any follow up questioning of the organization or it's spokesperson as to Clinton's international promotion of fracking in Europe, Africa and the Middle East while she was Secretary of State, her support for the Keystone Pipeline, Clinton's very private, very lucrative, no-press-allowed Philadelphia fundraiser for Big Energy lobbyists, criticism of Clinton by other major environmental groups, Hillary's BFF relationship with Monsanto, etc.

Don't tell me that the Washington Post is held in such low regard by the NRDC that it's president or PR person would not take a phone call from a Wa-Po reporter with follow up questions.

The reporter repeats paragraph after paragraph of the pro-Hillary press release, but didn't take time to get a response from Sanders or his campaign. And the NRDC's silence on Sanders is deafening.
I suggest that the reporter put down the cheerleader pom-poms & try her hand at investigative reporting. She's never going to be getting an SDX award at the National Press Club with puff pieces like this. I am not surprised that her degree is in government, not in journalism. I suggest she take a career break and enroll in Columbia's graduate program for a master's in journalism.

Check out comments following the article. Here's a sampling:
8:55 AM EST

So what you're saying is, the NRDC Action Fund is thumbs up for Fracking and the Keystone XL Pipeline? Oh, lets not forget about the TPP which will give corporations an opening to pollute more, since they'll be suing every government under the sun to do so, since they'll be sovereign entities now. Good job on your research NRDC Action Fund ... you really knocked this one out of the park, or padded your pockets, either way you've sold your morals and screwed the people of this planet.


Meanwhile the rest of the legit environmental groups found Hillary's supports Fracking which is Hillary approved, According to Greenpeace : Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Super PAC supporting her have received $138,400 from fossil fuel lobbyists and $1,327,210 from bundlers. http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/0...


The NRCD Action Fund endorsing Hillary an Arch supporter of fracking? I thought I'd seen it all. Look, if Clinton has you in her pocket just say so and stop already the Trump bogeyman. Hillary might edge out Sanders in California but she's toast. She's been unelectable as POTUS before and since 2008. She WILL lose to Trump come November. The writing has been on the wall for a long while and only members of her cult are convinced she's presidential material.
Good to see that some people are thinking. MariaThinks May 2016 #1
K&R... quickesst May 2016 #2
Excellent! Great endorsement. livetohike May 2016 #3
Where the Rubber Meets the Road for this Election bucolic_frolic May 2016 #4
Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. Good for Team Hillary. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #5
"Left-leaning?".. well sort of. Depends on the meaning of left...and leaning... pangaia May 2016 #6
The passion experience and savvy to build on Obama's environmental legacy spanzini May 2016 #7
How about opening up the Santra Barbara coastline to fracking? raindaddy May 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #8
This is a PR puff piece, not an investigative report. Divernan May 2016 #9
"And the NRDC's silence on Sanders is deafening." TwilightZone May 2016 #15
Great news for Hillary Cryptoad May 2016 #10
How is it that Hillary Lean May 2016 #18
You gotta love those who continue to point to polls puffy socks May 2016 #59
K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow May 2016 #11
Lol EdwardBernays May 2016 #12
I am SHOCKED! SHOCKED!!!! dorkzilla May 2016 #24
but the Newish President was very anti-fracking trudyco May 2016 #50
Yep, I thought I heard the bus coming. RandySF May 2016 #54
So, that would be the PAC Kelvin Mace May 2016 #13
Yes, because it's likely that the organization itself cannot endorse anyone. alarimer May 2016 #45
Gov Jerry Brown CA just Endorsed Hillary just now: Brown is concerned with the GE and riversedge May 2016 #16
Enormous respect for Jerry, I have. Actor May 2016 #51
Guess I'll be looking for another environmental group to support. truebrit71 May 2016 #17
"the NRDC Action Fund, a political affiliate of the Natural Resources Defense Council" MisterP May 2016 #19
Wrong TwilightZone May 2016 #21
Yay fracking! dragonfly301 May 2016 #20
Wow jpmonk91 May 2016 #30
Based on history, I would expect Hillary Clinton to be a weak environmental POTUS. PufPuf23 May 2016 #22
Queen fracking retrowire May 2016 #23
It doesn't but we're supposed to pretend it does dorkzilla May 2016 #25
why cant the world make sense? retrowire May 2016 #26
IDK I'm very disappointed jpmonk91 May 2016 #29
Lots more company BlueMTexpat May 2016 #27
This is a great endorsement DesertRat May 2016 #28
All Hail the Eventual Fracker-in-Chief! Herman4747 May 2016 #31
This endorsement jpmonk91 May 2016 #32
and Trump WILL keep burning fossil fuels. riversedge May 2016 #33
Wow you don't get it jpmonk91 May 2016 #34
Oh, I get that June 7th will be #HillaryCelebrationDay riversedge May 2016 #37
Sigh that is not relevant to jpmonk91 May 2016 #38
Yea... deathrind May 2016 #53
Also jpmonk91 May 2016 #40
So happy angrychair May 2016 #35
I agree jpmonk91 May 2016 #36
A lot of these groups have strange bedfellows. alarimer May 2016 #46
Never Heard of Them mishi48.59 May 2016 #39
It says they are a "major environmental group" right in the headline to let you know. bluedigger May 2016 #41
They have two million members and have been around for 45 years. TwilightZone May 2016 #42
Look silly, Hell. bluedigger May 2016 #43
Yep. PatrynXX May 2016 #49
I don't care. jpmonk91 May 2016 #44
I like to minimize people and organizations predicated wholly on my ignorance of them too. LanternWaste May 2016 #57
The Natural Resources Defense Council Is A Very Active Environmental Group... TomCADem May 2016 #58
Thank you! mishi48.59 Jun 2016 #60
Given the number of past candidates with perhaps better "green" track records that didn't get their hughee99 May 2016 #47
disappointed in NRDC. usually they are smart PatrynXX May 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #55
NRDC very clearly saying it hasn't endorsed even if its PAC did MisterP May 2016 #56
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Major environmental group...»Reply #9