Latest Breaking News

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)

2. I saw him on Meet the Press

Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:11 AM

Jun 2016

He has demands for Hillary before he will decide to endorse her.

It is the first time I can recall a losing campaign demanding the winning campaign of taking on the losing campaign's platform.

It believe it is unwarranted arrogance. And, he seems to want it both ways. I have heard him say that he has no control over his supporters. And conversely, if his demands are not met, he will not assist the democrats.

Ironically, there is really very little difference between Hillary's stances and Sanders' rather it is about process. And, it has been determined by a multitude of independent experts, that Sanders' process will not make the changes that Hillary's will.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders, Clinton to meet Tuesday [View all] brooklynite Jun 2016 OP

Very good news. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #1

I saw him on Meet the Press Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #2

He shouldn't endorse her Skink Jun 2016 #3

I think it does not matter who he supports Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #5

Please stop this divisive talk. You won. Get over it Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #8

So a response to Evergreen Emerald about being decisive, but not to Skink? Chicago1980 Jun 2016 #19

Hillary needs Bernie more than Bernie needs Hillary BlueStreak Jun 2016 #36

+1. But Democrats really could take the Senate. More Republicans defending seats than Dems. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #44

50 seats in the Senate gets you committee heads, that's all BlueStreak Jun 2016 #51

Actually, it's eating kittens that he's interested in. Wilms Jun 2016 #9

Only their eyeballs. Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #21

I don't trust Bernie.... FarPoint Jun 2016 #11

How painful it must be Plucketeer Jun 2016 #24

I feel no pain..... FarPoint Jun 2016 #45

You're "textbook" Plucketeer Jun 2016 #60

Well... maybe since you are a closed book yourself... FarPoint Jun 2016 #63

You're right about that Plucketeer Jun 2016 #68

I understand....you described that you have FarPoint Jun 2016 #70

THAT'S Plucketeer Jun 2016 #73

Thank you for your support. FarPoint Jun 2016 #74

LOL Plucketeer Jun 2016 #69

You just described Hillary Clinton. Gene Debs Jun 2016 #25

he definately discribed Hillary, stunningly correct swhisper1 Jun 2016 #50

Votes are power. Sanders got lots of votes. Would be arrogant to ignore him the way you advocate. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #4

But, he said he has no control over his supporters Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #6

I, and perhaps you in time, realize that his supporters LISTEN to him even if he doesnt CONTROL them Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #7

I disagree with you. Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #10

Sorry but this post is just bunk. "dehumanizing Hillary" was his whole campaign? Millions of FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #15

So, your angry attacks Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #18

(MY angry attacks? I think you are maybe replying to the poster above, or...? ) FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #66

Hillary de-humanized herself years ago with "bring them to heel" swhisper1 Jun 2016 #17

Bernies performance was SO on-the-level Plucketeer Jun 2016 #26

No, it wasn't. It was hypocritical. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #29

"kid gloves" Plucketeer Jun 2016 #32

Yep. Kid gloves. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #34

LOL!!! Plucketeer Jun 2016 #43

ROFL!! BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #47

Indeed! Plucketeer Jun 2016 #61

Like I said...Waste. Of. Time. Thanks for proving my point! BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #64

You are right about the kid gloves pandr32 Jun 2016 #57

While I don't, really... Plucketeer Jun 2016 #62

Here's black and white for you: Hillary won. Sanders LOST. There isn't any gray area BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #65

Enjoy your rigged fantasy! nt Plucketeer Jun 2016 #67

When all else fails (like the acceptance of facts) just say it was rigged!!11 BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #71

EVERY bit as predictable Plucketeer Jun 2016 #72

Insignificant essentially...the amount of hard core Sanders supporters. FarPoint Jun 2016 #12

Yes, they'll almost all vote Democratic. But Sanders now has influence tho some try to suppress it. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #14

they will vote for her but will listen and believe Sanders. His table is clean and bountiful swhisper1 Jun 2016 #20

If you really believe that, you don't know your candidate. eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #31

But I have known her for 40 yrs swhisper1 Jun 2016 #37

Who? Jill Stein? eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #40

Hillary swhisper1 Jun 2016 #48

Yep. About 75% will cast their vote for Hillary Clinton, leaving 25% (not bad odds). And half of BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #35

I intend to "sit home" Plucketeer Jun 2016 #41

How short a memory. the Obama/Clinton meeting got her the SoS position swhisper1 Jun 2016 #13

? Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #16

Could we stop with the Sander slams? StoneCarver Jun 2016 #22

How about perhaps we stop with the Hillary slams? calimary Jun 2016 #55

I think he is going to ask Hillary Clinton to pay his debt. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #23

IF Sanders needs money Plucketeer Jun 2016 #27

. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #30

lol Hiraeth Jun 2016 #28

Sanders is not in debt. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #54

Sarcasm Hiraeth Jun 2016 #58

that is silly swhisper1 Jun 2016 #38

seems legit ! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #53

Tuesday is the end of The Bernie campaign.... dubyadiprecession Jun 2016 #33

thank you, the hate here is waist deep, nice to hear a reasonable reply swhisper1 Jun 2016 #39

Sanders supporter, here. I think he's trying to find a way to concede that doesn't cause... Odin2005 Jun 2016 #42

I have a way, Bernie needs to go after the Republican Congress. Revolutions don't L. Coyote Jun 2016 #46

probably. They both want a smooth transition no matter who ends up winning swhisper1 Jun 2016 #49

Just stop MFM008 Jun 2016 #52

I suppose we'll hear the obligatory "Well, he didn't win..." KansDem Jun 2016 #56

Only if we let them Red Mountain Jun 2016 #59