Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
44. The timing of this suggests she won't be.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jun 2016

This is the general election black hole, where the nominees are presumptive and so is everything else. One of the largest bumps in voter interest comes with the official announcement of the nominee's chosen running mate, timed to hit the papers just before the convention hits its peak.

Therefore candidates and their staves have a large interest in keeping the press distracted from the actual nominee, by "dangling" other people before the press like so much raw meat above a lion pit.

So it looks like Elizabeth Warren is being offered as a "dangle." If she is the actual chosen running mate of Mrs. Clinton, the timing of this news report is either highly unconventional or very damaging.

This year insiders are knowingly whispering the name of Julian Castro, and look at the difference between that linked story and this one. Castro's people are desperately trying to shush speculation about a VP run, instead of encouraging it. That's exactly what you would expect to see from the actual presumptive running mate.

In the meantime, Donald Trump's campaign is FUBAR, but sooner or later they'll probably start playing the dangle game, too, because the press will push them into it. Generally, and especially with idiot draft dodging Republicans, they are paired with brass in proportion to how woefully unprepared they are and how fast they ran from combat. Nixon and Reagan needed decorated veterans; Shrub needed a Secretary of Defense; Trump is going to need a four-star something with a rack of purple hearts.

I don't think it's likely, but I would be 100% behind it. nt onehandle Jun 2016 #1
I would love to see here there! Drahthaardogs Jun 2016 #8
I really like Elizabeth Warren, but I'll be shocked if she's VP TDale313 Jun 2016 #2
THIS! MidwestTech Jun 2016 #14
I've (admittedly cynically) wondered for some time TDale313 Jun 2016 #45
The timing of this suggests she won't be. sofa king Jun 2016 #44
Its a great idea jzodda Jun 2016 #3
She will be 75 in eight years (67 next week) question everything Jun 2016 #17
Warren got the most support in the poll I ran last week Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #4
A conservative Democrat from the South or Midwest seems more likely. jalan48 Jun 2016 #5
I suspect that would result in failure. davidthegnome Jun 2016 #10
Agree. colorado_ufo Jun 2016 #16
Damn good points. davidthegnome Jun 2016 #19
Hillary already plays strong with moderate and conservatives in the South and Midwest already apnu Jun 2016 #26
If the list from the Washington Post is to be believed, the pick will likely be a liberal Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #29
Love Warren, but this is a bad idea Saviolo Jun 2016 #6
+1 Hoppy Jun 2016 #7
"The Vice Presidency isn't worth a bucket of warm spit" -John Nance Garner Fumesucker Jun 2016 #9
I think it has more to do with the administration in question than the actual position. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #41
I agree. potone Jun 2016 #13
Really? I suspect Clinton would offer her the VP slot expressly to get Warren OUT of the Senate, Gene Debs Jun 2016 #24
It's hard not to suspect some sort of mischievous rationale when it comes to HRC. KPN Jun 2016 #30
+1 Pastiche423 Jun 2016 #37
100% Agree! KPN Jun 2016 #28
I totally agree. If she was VP, her future woild be tied to Hillary's approval rating... olddad56 Jun 2016 #48
Not gonna happen Bayard Jun 2016 #11
She could ride into the White House christx30 Jun 2016 #12
With so many white men opposing Hillary question everything Jun 2016 #15
On the contrary. colorado_ufo Jun 2016 #18
"Were Hillary a man, Bernie would be the candidate at this point. " geek tragedy Jun 2016 #21
Clinton is not playing the woman card colorado_ufo Jun 2016 #31
Okay, maybe this is more what the "she's only winning because she's a woman" line reminds me of: geek tragedy Jun 2016 #34
Damn, that would be something, wouldn't it? packman Jun 2016 #20
It's every bit as foolish to make gender the criterion for selecting someone as it is to make it Gene Debs Jun 2016 #25
Yah, but I still like the idea packman Jun 2016 #35
If it makes you feel better to think that that makes the argument fall apart, then go ahead. Gene Debs Jun 2016 #39
You appear to be confusing 'the criterion' with pride in their ascension to the role. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #42
As much as I admire Warren, this is a disastrously bad idea on multiple levels. Gene Debs Jun 2016 #22
+1 KPN Jun 2016 #32
I'd rather see her as Senate Majority leader. N/t roamer65 Jun 2016 #23
Definitely would be a waste of talent! dmosh42 Jun 2016 #27
Warren would be a great running mate Gothmog Jun 2016 #33
Picking Warren wouldn't ensure support from Berners. KPN Jun 2016 #36
I have to admit I'd love it. nolabear Jun 2016 #38
Get Bernie supporters and keep her from causing trouble in the Senate fbc Jun 2016 #40
yup, basically defangs her LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #46
Not sure if it is politically smart, but it would make me happy! nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #43
NOOOOO, we need her in the Senate!!! Odin2005 Jun 2016 #47
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton Is Actively Vetti...»Reply #44