Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHan

(10,173 posts)
67. Actually other stakeholders have seen it:
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 11:29 PM
Jan 2017

There have been meetings with consumer groups, trade associations, labor unions.Here is the full list: https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/blog/2014/February/a-note-on-stakeholder-consultation

Fact sheet on transparency: https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/fact-sheets/2015/january/fact-sheet-transparency-and-obama


Congress established a system of Advisory Committees to get input from affected industries. The Obama Administration has grown the size and membership of our trade advisory committees to add voices that were initially left out of the process. In doing so we have worked to ensure strong representation from:

Labor unions,
Environmental groups,
Faith organizations,
Public health and consumer advocates,
Consumer organizations,
Local and state officials,
Farmers, ranchers, small business, and many more diverse interests.
These advisors receive full and equal access to U.S. negotiating proposals and work with our negotiators in an interactive process that includes regular updates on the negotiations, the opportunity to review U.S. proposals before they are tabled, and the chance to provide meaningful input into negotiating proposals and decisions. Over the past year, USTR has been soliciting additional nominations for candidates to further represent labor and non-industry interests, as well as further representatives of agriculture, services, and other sectors of the economy. We welcome additional participants and are open to new ideas on how we can expand input.

We are always looking for new ways to engage the public and to seek views that will help inform and guide our trade policy, and enhancing transparency will remain a priority, consistent with the ability to deliver on our ultimate mission, which is to deliver agreements that achieve the maximum possible benefit for the American people. That’s our focus.



"WORKING HAND-IN-HAND WITH CONGRESS, THE PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVES

The administration has worked closely with the people’s representatives in Congress as we pursue our ambitious trade agenda. This has included:

Providing access to the full TPP negotiating texts for any Member of Congress, including for Members to view at their convenience in the Capitol, accompanied by staff members with appropriate security clearance.
Holding nearly 1,700 Congressional briefings on TPP alone, and many more on T-TIP, TPA, AGOA and other initiatives.
Providing Members of Congress with plain English summaries of TPP chapters to assist Members in navigating the negotiating text.
Previewing U.S. proposals with Congressional committees before taking them to the negotiations.
Working with Congress to update them on the state of the negotiations and get feedback every step of the way
."


It's pretty standard for negotiations to be secret, it doesn't mean evil bad stuff happened behind closed doors. What would have happened if this had reached Congress, is that all deliberations would have been made public and the President would have had to make the entire trade agreement public. This is a requirement of the TPA :https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33743.pdf


It was an objective that I and Bernie wanted. retrowire Jan 2017 #1
Agreed NWCorona Jan 2017 #2
Here, here but then yuck Rural_Progressive Jan 2017 #12
Same here. tenorly Jan 2017 #19
Problem is protectionism can sometimes make things worse like it did after the cstanleytech Jan 2017 #20
Too true. nt marybourg Jan 2017 #63
stupidest move in a post WW2 history. kennetha Jan 2017 #26
I agree 100%. China will now dominate the largest consumer market of this century - Asia. Trust Buster Jan 2017 #35
This cannot be understated. They will also have all of Australia. NotThisTime Jan 2017 #42
Agreed, and the shortsighted America will see higher prices and a loss of potential American jobs Trust Buster Jan 2017 #58
Exactly. We will be sorry one day. Hoyt Jan 2017 #51
Agree. Hate to agree, but agree Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #57
agree. I feel for all the small asian pacific countries who loved the idea of their own free trade Sunlei Jan 2017 #73
We will regret this but people won't even inform themselves. yardwork Jan 2017 #75
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #28
I'm certain you're about to be banned but retrowire Jan 2017 #29
I 100% agree I like Obama but I hated the TPP. I miss Obama already though :(. n/t. ZM90 Jan 2017 #30
Me too, I'm glad... Raine Jan 2017 #46
Let's now sit and see the jobs pour in Nick Otean Jan 2017 #74
Not. Squinch Jan 2017 #77
We'll see underpants Jan 2017 #3
They also want to renegotiate NAFTA... I wonder how that will play out. n/t secondwind Jan 2017 #4
Say hello to higher prices on imports Zorro Jan 2017 #5
yup... SledDriver Jan 2017 #8
Sounds like a step in the right direction. jalan48 Jan 2017 #16
No, the problem is not that they need to go away as retailers employee alot of people the problem is cstanleytech Jan 2017 #22
The bigger problem to me is that most of their products are made in Third World countries where jalan48 Jan 2017 #24
So now the can go back to rice paddys and dirt farms at much less pay. Hoyt Jan 2017 #52
Yeah-those sweat shops are so much better than what they have been doing for centuries. jalan48 Jan 2017 #55
No one made them leave the rice paddy. They choose a chance to learn Hoyt Jan 2017 #56
Actually, in Mexico workers were forced off their farms and into manufacturing centers. jalan48 Jan 2017 #59
Sure. $8 an hour at an Audi plant forced them from the 50 cent a day dirt farm. Hoyt Jan 2017 #60
Exactly, taxes on the corporations are a way to balance things out. cstanleytech Jan 2017 #83
Exactly mdbl Jan 2017 #62
That's good in many ways madville Jan 2017 #43
China happy? n/t delisen Jan 2017 #6
Great. Now China has ALL of Asia on a silver platter. Yavin4 Jan 2017 #7
thanks for a true and rational post OKNancy Jan 2017 #11
Are you being sarcastic? Yavin4 Jan 2017 #15
not at all. I agree with you OKNancy Jan 2017 #17
Okay. Sorry. Yavin4 Jan 2017 #18
I agree. This is an extremely short sighted and emotional move. Trust Buster Jan 2017 #36
Exactly tammywammy Jan 2017 #13
TPP would have made no difference. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #32
Maybe, but being able to pass our own laws and regulations Rural_Progressive Jan 2017 #14
The TPP was never going to take those things away. JHan Jan 2017 #25
How can you possibly make that statement Rural_Progressive Jan 2017 #38
Check on this link: JHan Jan 2017 #40
Not what I asked for and you didn't provide it because you can't Rural_Progressive Jan 2017 #66
Actually other stakeholders have seen it: JHan Jan 2017 #67
Do explain how and why Trans Canada is suing the US truebluegreen Jan 2017 #61
"since you know so much" - it's a massive agreement.. JHan Jan 2017 #64
Canada has lost. truebluegreen Jan 2017 #69
I get the reticence.. JHan Jan 2017 #71
Pretty much. SMH. JHan Jan 2017 #23
Yep bravenak Jan 2017 #27
I agree with you that this is a mistake.n/t MBS Jan 2017 #53
Aaaaaand there it is. Squinch Jan 2017 #78
can you say DOW 9000 elmac Jan 2017 #9
Great news! Talk Is Cheap Jan 2017 #10
Good. The guy is still a fascist, but getting out of TPP and renegotiating trade agreements PatrickforO Jan 2017 #21
So it was pointless to keep the platform ambiguous on this. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #31
That means Mexico can ask for renegotiation of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. roamer65 Jan 2017 #33
It will be problematic Penn Voter Jan 2017 #34
You are correct. This will be a two way street that will increase price and cost U.S. jobs. Trust Buster Jan 2017 #37
The thing that most bothered me about Sanders kennetha Jan 2017 #39
Good post. llmart Jan 2017 #65
Many on the left refused to acknowledge what you talk about here, and contributed Squinch Jan 2017 #80
What's that they say about "broken clocks"? Hayabusa Jan 2017 #41
Exactly NWCorona Jan 2017 #45
"This reduces the wholesale price of Melania and Ivanka's cheap, tawdry crap by at least 30 percent" jmowreader Jan 2017 #44
Good! nt Quackers Jan 2017 #47
well rtracey Jan 2017 #48
Outstanding! This will piss off the establishment in both parties. nt m-lekktor Jan 2017 #49
Good, this will piss off the 1%'rs harun Jan 2017 #50
FDR established free trade as a fundamental of sound economics tirebiter Jan 2017 #54
Free Trade is a toxic issue. Has been for a while. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #68
ALL TPP countries love the extra billions in trade & China is happy to take USA Asian Pacific seat. Sunlei Jan 2017 #70
The Chinese are quivering in their boots... brooklynite Jan 2017 #72
And middle America begins blaming Obama for the resulting inflation in 3..2..1... Squinch Jan 2017 #76
I'll be curious to see if all those here extolling this move "because Bernie" will admit that Squinch Jan 2017 #79
I've admitted here before when I was wrong. NWCorona Jan 2017 #81
What we are seeing is the unravelling of progress SteamAddict Jan 2017 #82
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US announces withdrawal f...»Reply #67