Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

politicat

(9,808 posts)
16. One of the reasons Medicare costs were off on the 1975 estimate vs 2000 was technology.
Wed May 24, 2017, 08:44 PM
May 2017

We learned how to treat cancer, use computers for diagnostic imaging, implant reliable pacemakers, run effective stents and shunts, replace valves, transplant one liver into multiple people, cure Hep C, replace knees and hips with titanium, mitigate MS, ALS and rheumatic arthritis, and manage hundreds of conditions with medication. In 1975, those were almost all quickly fatal, and thus not too expensive.

That's what skewed that old CBO estimate that these chowderheads keep pulling out. The 1980 to 2005 estimate is also bad, as is the 1985 to 2010. By 1990, the numbers fall into line, because the CBO recognized that technology would change everything.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»HHS Secretary Tom Price: ...»Reply #16