Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
4. I didn't say a thing about whether or not he was actually guilty
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:58 PM
Apr 2019

I think you misunderstand. White police officers are often acquitted for what most of us, and the whole community, believe are unjustified killings.

I think Mr. Noor would have had a far better chance of acquittal if he were "Mr. Nelson." I'm not speaking to his actual guilt or innocence. I'm speculating about how race might be a factor in a jury decision.

This is just about standard in the testimony of an LEO in this situation: "Noor testified that he feared for his partner's life as Ruszczyk approached their squad car in the dark, empty alley." 99.999% of the time that statement alone prevents the DA from filing charges or allows the jury a way to acquit. I just think that juries are more likely to acquit white police officers than dark-skinned ones with Muslim-sounding names. A white man, by default, will have the trust of juries and be given the benefit of the doubt.

This is the part that is NOT standard: But Hennepin County prosecutors said Noor overreacted and failed to properly assess the situation before firing a gunshot into Ruszczyk's abdomen.

Look at past cases. It's rare for the DA to even bring a case, much less vigorously prosecute one.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former Minneapolis police...»Reply #4