Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PSPS

(15,377 posts)
2. Significant differences between this and Ellsberg
Fri May 24, 2019, 09:19 PM
May 2019

Assange likes to say his actions were the same as any journalist. This is ridiculous for several reasons, some of which are:

1. A legitimate news organization would vet the information. Assange did not and may have falsified some of it.

2. A legitimate news organization would remove information that would put people in peril before publishing it. Assange did not and, in fact, some sources were killed because of it.

3. A legitimate news organization would seek comments from the parties involved before publishing. Assange didn't do this at all and merely dumped whatever he deemed useful for his political goals without any filter at all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Some federal prosecutors ...»Reply #2