Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Mr.Bill

(24,282 posts)

1. I bet some of the redacted material

Reply to Calista241 (Original post)

Thu Nov 7, 2019, 11:29 PM

Nov 2019

has the potential to send the House investigation back to square one. The only reason they would have to redact anything and not even let members of congress with the highest security clearances see it is it incriminates Trump, his family and his gang.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

These Are the Judges Who Will Decide Whether House Dems Should Get Unredacted Mueller Report [View all] Calista241 Nov 2019 OP

I bet some of the redacted material Mr.Bill Nov 2019 #1

There's some irony here MissMillie Nov 2019 #2

Judge Garland did NOT select the panel of judges. onenote Nov 2019 #3

Thomas Griffith was nominated by George W. Bush, Judith Rogers nominated by Bill Clinton. nt iluvtennis Nov 2019 #4

the TAXPAYERS paid for this report Skittles Nov 2019 #5

+1000 ancianita Nov 2019 #6

Exactly! mountain grammy Nov 2019 #7

The taxpayers pay for everything the government does. Igel Nov 2019 #8

I don't remember Holder giving a bullshit summary of info he would not release Skittles Nov 2019 #9