We can't leave it to voters if the President is soliciting interference (Reply #2)

In the discussion thread: Moderate Dems warn against 'kitchen sink' impeachment push [View all]

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 10:57 PM

2. We can't leave it to voters if the President is soliciting interference

in our elections. He is a clear and present danger.

If we wanted to, we could make this the biggest, longest impeachment case in history, and people would be talking about it, saying it’s the biggest in history. And it would also be the largest and one of the greatest, if not THE greatest in history, many, many people are saying.

God knows Trump commits so many abuses of power in plain sight, we could never finish counting.

But it only takes one article.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

36 replies	Author	Time	Post
Moderate Dems warn against 'kitchen sink' impeachment push [View all]	brooklynite	Dec 2019	OP
The biggest problem is that 45* has committed so damned many impeachable offenses.....	groundloop	Dec 2019	#1
We can't leave it to voters if the President is soliciting interference	Qutzupalotl	Dec 2019	#2
"We can't leave it to voters if the President is soliciting interference." Enough said. n/t	TheFourthMind	Dec 2019	#3
Trump only won by 75,000 votes. Its THERE to win. But it doesnt mean anything goes.	oldsoftie	Dec 2019	#21
the kitchen sink needs...	stillcool	Dec 2019	#4
Problem is that it could confuse alot of voters and the Republicans would move to exploit it	cstanleytech	Dec 2019	#6
"an audio recording of Trump talking with Putin"	lagomorph777	Dec 2019	#26
That isnt what I meant and you know it. What is needed is a clear conversation of such a phone call	cstanleytech	Dec 2019	#28
My point is, we don't actually need that because he did it out in the open.	lagomorph777	Dec 2019	#29
Hey I agree he probably had a number of such secret conversations but just because I believe it does	cstanleytech	Dec 2019	#30
and proof does not equal swayed opinions.	lagomorph777	Dec 2019	#32
My message to "Moderate Dems":	Miguelito Loveless	Dec 2019	#5
...	BlueMTexpat	Dec 2019	#12
Exactly,	Magoo48	Dec 2019	#16
What utterly frustrates me is the fact	Miguelito Loveless	Dec 2019	#25
The job of Congress is to Defend and Protect the Constitution	turbinetree	Dec 2019	#27
rw media is selling that 'moderate dems' are at risk bullshit and the media gets 'concerned'	certainot	Dec 2019	#20
If Bloomberg and Steyer want to save the country,	lagomorph777	Dec 2019	#31
just buying iheartless/unclear would do it, and cheaper, it's prob still $20 bil in debt	certainot	Dec 2019	#35
Deploraphobia	William Seger	Dec 2019	#24
Don't stop with the kitchen sink! Throw in a baby grand piano	htuttle	Dec 2019	#7
Now is not the time for moderation... impeach the bastard now!!	InAbLuEsTaTe	Dec 2019	#8
The Moderates want to normalize 10 Counts of Obstruction of Justice ?	ritapria	Dec 2019	#9
This	orangecrush	Dec 2019	#10
Or	BannonsLiver	Dec 2019	#14
This is about obstruction of justice	JonLP24	Dec 2019	#15
In a perfect world there would be a meeting of centrists from both parties, but those days	abqtommy	Dec 2019	#11
Oh, dont forget, "moderate" republicans are RINOs.	oldsoftie	Dec 2019	#22
From what I've seen, "moderate Republicans" have been extinct for a long time.	abqtommy	Dec 2019	#23
His pattern of obstruction goes back to the Mueller investigation	JonLP24	Dec 2019	#13
It's a matter of degree	bucolic_frolic	Dec 2019	#17
History is in the impeachment hearing committee room taking notes.	Maribelle	Dec 2019	#18
The "blue dogs" can always vote against an obstruction of justice	DeminPennswoods	Dec 2019	#19
Politicians are elected, ostensibly	Dyedinthewoolliberal	Dec 2019	#33
Of "moderate dems" are talking about charges Mueller suggested were supported by the	Nitram	Dec 2019	#34
Fuck that shit we're moving ahead with or without them...	Blue_Tires	Dec 2019	#36

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.