Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Mersky

(4,980 posts)

10. Maybe? I need to know more.

Reply to Jose Garcia (Reply #5)

Wed Dec 11, 2019, 11:25 AM

Dec 2019

I'll put your charge in the bucket of possibilities. Will likely revisit this court decision over the next days as more reporting surfaces.

Big Oil, Exxon, deserves a day in court actually defending it's legacy of supporting climate denial, leaded gasoline, resource wars, etc. I think there are real cases to bring.

Did the AG bring a hollow case or did it become hollowed out?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Exxon found not guilty in New York climate-change securities fraud trial, ending 4-year saga [View all] Eugene Dec 2019 OP

wonder who exon bought out. AllaN01Bear Dec 2019 #1

Why didn't they call witnesses? Mersky Dec 2019 #2

Puzzling lack of offering up a necessary element of the case. JudyM Dec 2019 #3

Maybe the State AG was bluffing hoping that dware Dec 2019 #4

It was a political stunt Jose Garcia Dec 2019 #5

And losing? dware Dec 2019 #6

Her campaign ads will omit that part Jose Garcia Dec 2019 #8

No doubt. nt dware Dec 2019 #9

Maybe? I need to know more. Mersky Dec 2019 #10

Not sure I understand the point of the lawsuit? robbob Dec 2019 #7

NY has, eh, standing to bring securities fraud charges Mersky Dec 2019 #11