Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pachamama

(16,886 posts)
25. Her husband is a spook (yes, a spy) and was working at the listening station base in UK
Sun Dec 22, 2019, 12:31 PM
Dec 2019

You can refer to what IMpotus’s State Dept says, but I suggest you read Article 10, 39 and Article 41 of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Immunity pertaining diplomatic immunity and see that this is not fact that she has diplomatic immunity.

Here is a good summary of those articles in the convention on Diplomatic Immunity:

Article 10: According to Article 10; the receiving country should be notified of any decision to leave, which neither Sacoolas nor embassy officials did.

Article 39: According to Article 39, the privileges of the embassy and its staff begin and end at their border. In other words, In returning to the U.S., (along with not notifying the UK government), Sacoolas has lost those rights and entitlements.

Under Article 41: Envoys and their dependents are expected to observe the laws of the receiving country. (Clearly she didn’t do that)

Finally, the US can waive the “privilege” should they choose to.

How do I know this shit? Because I am the kid of a former spook who lived abroad and had to learn these things and understand them.

Anne Sacoolas should not be protected by diplomatic immunity and is in addition to being guilty of manslaughter and running the scene - a despicable coward.

My guess is she was drunk at the time and that explains why she handled the matter this way. She had a perfectly good explanation and defense at the scene of the accident that as an American she made a mistake of driving on the wrong side of the road. Instead she ran and got out of town fast - why exactly?



Now she hides in US and tried to have IMpotus pay off the family for her killing their son.

She should be sent back to the UK and stand trial. A different administration wouldn’t be protecting her and would simply waive the immunity immediately.

But this is Trump Administration and this kind of behavior is apparently OK for them and they thought money makes it alright.

It doesn’t - and normally she would have faced short prison time or probation and community service. But everything she has done shows not only guilt but frankly no responsibility or remorse. She likes to say she is a mother and understands. If she wanted to be a good example to her kids, she should take responsibility for what she did and the consequences.

It's almost impossible to extradite someone from the UK to the US. Calista241 Dec 2019 #1
It's the other way around. She would have to be extradited from the US into the UK. LisaL Dec 2019 #4
Have there been similar cases here in the US? keithbvadu2 Dec 2019 #2
The Rump admin is very busy looking into fake foreign 'crimes' committed by American citizens Mc Mike Dec 2019 #3
Life in prison for this disgusting piece of shit. Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #5
If she has diplomatic immunity, dware Dec 2019 #7
Neither her husband or her were Diplomats and didn't have Diplomatic Immunity Pachamama Dec 2019 #23
According to the State Dept. dware Dec 2019 #24
Her husband is a spook (yes, a spy) and was working at the listening station base in UK Pachamama Dec 2019 #25
Why is she a disgusting piece of shit? Chemisse Dec 2019 #8
She fled the country claiming diplomatic immunity! Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #9
What consequences? dware Dec 2019 #10
...and often these people get punished at home when it is egregious. Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #11
Ah I get it now, dware Dec 2019 #12
I'm all in. Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #13
Why not sue the person into the poor house? dware Dec 2019 #14
There is no realistic recourse here. She got away with it. Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #15
Only if she's declared persona non grata by the British Govt. dware Dec 2019 #19
Oh I see. She was driving on the wrong side of the road. Chemisse Dec 2019 #16
Yes...but the callousness since then is just awful and truly contemptible. Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #17
It's a really sad situation for the boy's family. Chemisse Dec 2019 #21
She wouldn't be facing a prison sentence, dware Dec 2019 #22
She was driving on the wrong side of the road. LisaL Dec 2019 #18
it would seem this was just a terrible accident Skittles Dec 2019 #20
Life in prison for an accident? Polybius Dec 2019 #26
The complete abdication of responsibility is egregious. Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #28
Why should she risk it? Polybius Dec 2019 #29
Sure...why not get away with it and thumb your nose at justice. Lucky Luciano Dec 2019 #31
Staying and risking jail would not have been a smart thing to do Polybius Dec 2019 #32
She was driving on the wrong side of the road. LisaL Dec 2019 #34
And what country did she learn to drive in? Polybius Dec 2019 #37
If you are driving in a foreign country, you have to know and follow the driving laws of LisaL Dec 2019 #38
Absolutely Polybius Dec 2019 #39
Don't you think that's an over reaction? I'm not sure about UK laws but in this totodeinhere Dec 2019 #35
A month and a half ago... Progressive Jones Dec 2019 #6
Th OP's post was from December 20th Polybius Dec 2019 #30
no, the link I put in my post was a month and a half ago. Related. nt Progressive Jones Dec 2019 #33
True Polybius Dec 2019 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Polybius Dec 2019 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UK charges US diplomat's ...»Reply #25