Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
11. You count the capital warming costs of producing batteries but do not count capital costs of nuclear
Fri Jun 26, 2020, 06:28 PM
Jun 2020

How convenient for your thesis.

Nuclear capital global warming costs are immense. All the materials for building the plants have to be mined, refined, fabricated, transported, and installed.

Plus the capital global warming costs of mining the fuel, refining it, producing fuel rods, transporting it safely with high security.

Then there are also the the ongoing maintenance global warming costs of a nuclear plant, also very high.

Plus the capital global warming costs of decommissioning, safing, and destruction.

And ... the capital global warming costs of securing, sealing, transporting safely, entombing, and maintaining a nuclear waste facility.

... without getting into the radioactive pollution legacy of the whole enterprise.

Yes, wind farms do have capital costs to manufacture, build, and maintain, but nothing on the scale of nuclear power.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California mandates big i...»Reply #11