Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)

11. So he can fire the patriot in charge, and TRY and install a typical rump appointment

Reply to cstanleytech (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 29, 2020, 04:46 PM

Jun 2020

who will be dedicated to taking away all rights from consumers, but whoever he appoints has to be approved by the Senate?

Too bad the senate is controlled by traitors.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court rules consumer regulator structure unconstitutional [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 OP

So what does this mean to the little guy. They will now go back to ripping us off in more ways again usaf-vet Jun 2020 #1

Simply means the President has the right to fire the head of the agency. cstanleytech Jun 2020 #3

Might have a bit broader meaning than that ... mr_lebowski Jun 2020 #5

No, the President is simply the ultimate authority over federal agencies but he cannot establish nor cstanleytech Jun 2020 #6

So he can fire the patriot in charge, and TRY and install a typical rump appointment Eliot Rosewater Jun 2020 #11

Sure he can try but the head of agents still have to be confirmed by the Senate which when you do cstanleytech Jun 2020 #12

Correct... and this shouldn't be surprising FBaggins Jun 2020 #13

Many people don't seem to understand how lucky we are ripcord Jun 2020 #15

Too bad We the People can't fire/recall the fucking President. rickyhall Jun 2020 #8

We can via the Senate when we do not have a corrupt Republican party cstanleytech Jun 2020 #9

Does that mean... Newest Reality Jun 2020 #2

So far we still have an SEC bucolic_frolic Jun 2020 #4

You can build an impregnable fortress but..... jaxexpat Jun 2020 #7

Ginsburg was right about the arguments being academic Warpy Jun 2020 #10

So Roberts must have read the 1970, Powell doctrine,........little people don't deserve turbinetree Jun 2020 #14

This essentially confirms Sgent Jun 2020 #16