Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
22. It's like we're purging the past, and I think we're going too far, IMO.
Wed Jul 22, 2020, 11:27 AM
Jul 2020

Confederate statues being the exception, because they were built decades after the civil war and were designed to oppress the black populations of America. That being said, we competed the WW2 memorial in Washington DC in 2004, some 70 years after winning the war. I'm not sure time frame is a good measure of this, but the oppression designed into confederate memorials just feels wrong to me.

But only in the last 100 years or so have we more or less purged slavery in modern societies. Literally every civilization before 1900 had slaves, oppressed some population, or waged war on someone to conquer land. The Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Chinese, Japanese, literally country that ever existed. Julius Caesar, the Prophet Muhammad, King David, George Washington, Pharaoh Ptolemy, Toussaint Louverture, every Chinese and Japanese Emperor, and almost anyone that you've ever read about in history books personally owned slaves at some point.

Should we support tearing down the Pyramids because they were built with slave labor? The White House, the Smithsonian, The Parthenon, the Leaning Tower of Pisa, The Colosseum, Angkor Wat, Machu Picchu, the Great Wall of China, others?

This message was self-deleted by its author denem Jul 2020 #1
Good for them Lulu KC Jul 2020 #2
i thought this Eugenics was a star trek and other scifi thing. AllaN01Bear Jul 2020 #3
Someone posted the other day "Who knew that our history books were fan fiction?" catrose Jul 2020 #12
K&R n/t ChazII Jul 2020 #4
so I guess they did a reseach on her catsudon Jul 2020 #5
They defended her for years. Igel Jul 2020 #6
?????? musette_sf Jul 2020 #9
from your link catsudon Jul 2020 #13
I disagree with the attacks on Sanger CatLady78 Jul 2020 #15
I don't think PP has to do this at all. musette_sf Jul 2020 #29
I am glad you contacted them and made these points CatLady78 Jul 2020 #36
I am really curious how they reply to you obamanut2012 Jul 2020 #37
Good. mahina Jul 2020 #7
I disagree with the decision that Planned Parenthood has made. musette_sf Jul 2020 #8
She Was Dedicated RobinA Jul 2020 #10
The morality of racism of eugenics and racism are one and the same. denem Jul 2020 #11
She Had Some Views RobinA Jul 2020 #19
This is a great post CatLady78 Jul 2020 #20
I disagree with your assertion that musette_sf Jul 2020 #26
"Nowhere in Ms Sanger's writings or speeches does she state that "deprived people" denem Jul 2020 #34
I am with you - she was a product of her times CatLady78 Jul 2020 #14
I agree catsudon Jul 2020 #17
"she was a product of her times" denem Jul 2020 #18
i did not know about catsudon Jul 2020 #21
It is cultural borderline personality CatLady78 Jul 2020 #23
Ms Sanger never made any reference to "lower races". musette_sf Jul 2020 #27
Crazy time kelly97 Jul 2020 #16
It's like we're purging the past, and I think we're going too far, IMO. Calista241 Jul 2020 #22
Let me quote Margaret Sanger herself. denem Jul 2020 #24
Abortion at the turn of the 20th century was a brutal, unperfected, slap-dash process Calista241 Jul 2020 #28
Agreed, and thank you for your post. musette_sf Jul 2020 #30
Sanger, by her own account, regarded abortion as barbaric denem Jul 2020 #32
All they did was take her name off a building Yeehah Jul 2020 #25
Except she wasn't "bad". musette_sf Jul 2020 #31
Was eugenics bad? denem Jul 2020 #33
She was a good person mixed with some bad Yeehah Jul 2020 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Planned Parenthood in N.Y...»Reply #22