Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CatLady78

(1,041 posts)
36. I am glad you contacted them and made these points
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 05:20 AM
Jul 2020

Thank you for doing that. I disagree very little with your points or with those by RobinA. I hope you prevail.

That said, I do still support PP for the simple reason that they are the most high profile organization that does the work they do. If they diluted their actual positions on birth control, abortion, gave a wider berth to religion/superstition/ anti science etc that would cause me real concern.

I simply do not know another org of that stature. They face constant smearing (as does Sanger) by religious zealots who are fairly tolerant of actual racists but suddenly become concerned about racism or the poor, when it is PP, Sanger, Paul Ehrlich, David Attenborough, Michael Moore...just about any feminist, environmentalist, scientist or liberal they can smear.
It is as hollow as Tucker Carlson's populism.

It is a cynical ploy and has little to do with concerns over the rights of the poor, racism etc.

This message was self-deleted by its author denem Jul 2020 #1
Good for them Lulu KC Jul 2020 #2
i thought this Eugenics was a star trek and other scifi thing. AllaN01Bear Jul 2020 #3
Someone posted the other day "Who knew that our history books were fan fiction?" catrose Jul 2020 #12
K&R n/t ChazII Jul 2020 #4
so I guess they did a reseach on her catsudon Jul 2020 #5
They defended her for years. Igel Jul 2020 #6
?????? musette_sf Jul 2020 #9
from your link catsudon Jul 2020 #13
I disagree with the attacks on Sanger CatLady78 Jul 2020 #15
I don't think PP has to do this at all. musette_sf Jul 2020 #29
I am glad you contacted them and made these points CatLady78 Jul 2020 #36
I am really curious how they reply to you obamanut2012 Jul 2020 #37
Good. mahina Jul 2020 #7
I disagree with the decision that Planned Parenthood has made. musette_sf Jul 2020 #8
She Was Dedicated RobinA Jul 2020 #10
The morality of racism of eugenics and racism are one and the same. denem Jul 2020 #11
She Had Some Views RobinA Jul 2020 #19
This is a great post CatLady78 Jul 2020 #20
I disagree with your assertion that musette_sf Jul 2020 #26
"Nowhere in Ms Sanger's writings or speeches does she state that "deprived people" denem Jul 2020 #34
I am with you - she was a product of her times CatLady78 Jul 2020 #14
I agree catsudon Jul 2020 #17
"she was a product of her times" denem Jul 2020 #18
i did not know about catsudon Jul 2020 #21
It is cultural borderline personality CatLady78 Jul 2020 #23
Ms Sanger never made any reference to "lower races". musette_sf Jul 2020 #27
Crazy time kelly97 Jul 2020 #16
It's like we're purging the past, and I think we're going too far, IMO. Calista241 Jul 2020 #22
Let me quote Margaret Sanger herself. denem Jul 2020 #24
Abortion at the turn of the 20th century was a brutal, unperfected, slap-dash process Calista241 Jul 2020 #28
Agreed, and thank you for your post. musette_sf Jul 2020 #30
Sanger, by her own account, regarded abortion as barbaric denem Jul 2020 #32
All they did was take her name off a building Yeehah Jul 2020 #25
Except she wasn't "bad". musette_sf Jul 2020 #31
Was eugenics bad? denem Jul 2020 #33
She was a good person mixed with some bad Yeehah Jul 2020 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Planned Parenthood in N.Y...»Reply #36