Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: In 'Stunning' 2-1 Decision, Appeals Court Says Congress Can't Enforce Subpoena Against Ex-WH Counsel [View all]onenote
(42,585 posts)37. No. One judge in common out of three
The Flynn panel was Rao, Henderson and Wilkins
This panel was Henderson, Griffith and Rogers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In 'Stunning' 2-1 Decision, Appeals Court Says Congress Can't Enforce Subpoena Against Ex-WH Counsel [View all]
Calista241
Aug 2020
OP
If the Dems also have the white house, McConnell may be more tempted to allow it
ArizonaLib
Aug 2020
#14
And I strongly believe killing the filibuster will be a watershed moment for Democrats
groundloop
Aug 2020
#20
Congress regulates the judicial branch and can pass laws that limit the scope of SCOTUS
ArizonaLib
Aug 2020
#27
I wonder how much of this is those 2 conservative judges auditioning for SCOTUS
ArizonaLib
Aug 2020
#15
Oh, but the Senate can't vote on Supreme Court nominees in an election year.....
groundloop
Aug 2020
#21
hmmm, so, there is a statute that says House and Senate have subpoena power?
Thomas Hurt
Aug 2020
#3
Translation: A Congressional Subpoena is utterly toothless and can be ignored with impunity.
maxsolomon
Aug 2020
#4