Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 02:37 AM Nov 2020

In a 5-4 ruling, Supreme Court sides with religious groups in a dispute over Covid-19 restrictions i [View all]

Source: CNN

In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court sided with religious organizations in a dispute over Covid-19 restrictions put in place by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo that limited attendance at religious services.

The case is the latest pitting religious groups against city and state officials seeking to stop the spread of Covid-19 and highlights the impact of Justice Amy Coney Barrett on the Court. It comes as Covid-19 related cases are spiking across the country.

In the late-night ruling, Barrett sided with the conservatives in the dispute, while Chief Justice John Roberts joined the three liberal justices in dissent. The ruling underscores Barrett's impact on the bench, reflecting the Court's rightward shift.

Last spring and summer, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was still alive, the court split 5-4 on similar cases, with Roberts and the liberals in the majority siding against houses of worship. Barrett was confirmed in October to take Ginsburg's seat.



Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in-a-5-4-ruling-supreme-court-sides-with-religious-groups-in-a-dispute-over-covid-19-restrictions-in-new-york/ar-BB1bnfQq?ocid=entnewsntp



No analysis out yet, although the ruling can be found: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf
81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DAMN! elleng Nov 2020 #1
and that it is certain Catholic and Jewish sects that are behind this injunction is not really a still_one Nov 2020 #31
It is funny you mention that OldBaldy1701E Nov 2020 #50
Something tells me ACB has a witch dunking tank in her back yard Blue Owl Nov 2020 #2
No. They burn them at the stake to soaring hymns of praise. olegramps Nov 2020 #38
So if religious groups want to do something that kills people it's their right. Kablooie Nov 2020 #3
The irony is that the ruling amounts to human sacrifice Ponietz Nov 2020 #30
Attendees should be made to wear a scarlet "R" yankeepants Nov 2020 #4
True... OldBaldy1701E Nov 2020 #48
So let me get this straight... pecosbob Nov 2020 #5
Here in Ontario women can go topless luvtheGWN Nov 2020 #54
Not sure what this means. IsItJustMe Nov 2020 #6
Ditto. This is ON APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, elleng Nov 2020 #8
The decision seems to say that the churches and synagogues under Cuomo's order were treated... TreasonousBastard Nov 2020 #13
The decision seems to say that the churches and synagogues under Cuomo's order were treated... TreasonousBastard Nov 2020 #14
Yes, almost sounds rational, eh? elleng Nov 2020 #19
Almost. TreasonousBastard Nov 2020 #21
Wouldn't this be easy to get around? ripcord Nov 2020 #75
No longer any need for separation of church and state nonsense. dchill Nov 2020 #7
But will those religious groups still be able to access PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #9
Perhaps Cuomo and other govs can impose mandatory quarantines for those fearnobush Nov 2020 #10
It appears the Court is seeking something less 'severe.' elleng Nov 2020 #11
I just did a very quick read of the orders and dissents, but they seem to say that the orders... TreasonousBastard Nov 2020 #15
Finally, it has not been shown that granting the applications will harm the public. elleng Nov 2020 #18
I read that, but how does that reasoning affect banquets, football games, and Thanksgiving dinner... TreasonousBastard Nov 2020 #20
Agudath Israel of America is included, not only ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN. elleng Nov 2020 #22
I am aware Agudath Israel was one of the complainants. And the banquet biz is affected... TreasonousBastard Nov 2020 #25
Restaurants as such not related to First Amendment issues. elleng Nov 2020 #26
It's all about the money Ziggysmom Nov 2020 #68
And once again, abject make believe wins out over science. stopbush Nov 2020 #12
This SCOTUS has lost its mind. joshcryer Nov 2020 #16
Fine! Then the Church should be sued... CalArkLiberal Nov 2020 #17
We must balance the court ASAP! BigmanPigman Nov 2020 #23
How do you propose doing that? FBaggins Nov 2020 #37
That needs to be our ultimate goal.. mountain grammy Nov 2020 #59
And if that ultimate goal keeps us from winning elections? FBaggins Nov 2020 #62
Well sorry, I disgree. mountain grammy Nov 2020 #67
The American Taliban has spoken...death cult in full effect... Moostache Nov 2020 #24
This will be an opportunity for people to learn about natural selection, and not in a good way still_one Nov 2020 #27
My Thought Exactly RobinA Nov 2020 #80
Legalized human sacrifice within & outside the faith? diva77 Nov 2020 #28
The ones who think congregating in large groups is a "good thing", are most likely trumpers still_one Nov 2020 #29
The Supreme Court is Now Filled with Activist Judges Op-ed Daily Nov 2020 #32
+1. Barrett is a rabid partisan and a despicable hypocrite dalton99a Nov 2020 #65
The right to die from ignorance and stupidity is fully intact bucolic_frolic Nov 2020 #33
+ a brazillion milestogo Nov 2020 #55
What kind of sane thinking is THIS? NONE! None @ all! Andrew will not be happy with this! Illumination Nov 2020 #34
this is no surprise with Barrett addition to the court but hey, some of the worshippers will be meet beachbumbob Nov 2020 #35
Maybe Covid is the vehicle through which they'll be raptured? Trueblue Texan Nov 2020 #36
Fine, but COVID-19 . . . Iliyah Nov 2020 #41
yep ..I couldn't agree more. Trueblue Texan Nov 2020 #56
Amy Covid Barrett lives up to her name Blues Heron Nov 2020 #39
So where is the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster on this? Shermann Nov 2020 #40
We are out to lunch on this one. Trueblue Texan Nov 2020 #57
Its very hard, Constitutionally, to limit freedom to worship. oldsoftie Nov 2020 #42
So fire codes are out and armed parishioners are in? If they want to kill themselves so be it. dem4decades Nov 2020 #43
I agree with all of the above responses, gab13by13 Nov 2020 #44
Then the churches moreland01 Nov 2020 #45
Jesus said beware of those who pray in public Blues Heron Nov 2020 #46
Any church that doesn't care for its congregation C_U_L8R Nov 2020 #47
If there is a genetic pre-disposition to fanaticism, then let Darwin's will be done. Gore1FL Nov 2020 #49
Christians wanna take each other out in a circular firing squad? I'm A-OK with that Tarc Nov 2020 #51
Well, here we go.... paleotn Nov 2020 #52
When people in those NY churches start dying, gab13by13 Nov 2020 #53
What about my religious rights to beat my wife and children? marble falls Nov 2020 #58
It really time to expand the "courts"..........and "churches" should be taxed........... turbinetree Nov 2020 #60
+1 dalton99a Nov 2020 #66
This is a clear violation of separation of church and state. infullview Nov 2020 #61
and here we are, literally llashram Nov 2020 #63
When I was a kid the USA was one of the smart countries. CrispyQ Nov 2020 #64
I stay from Republicans, and churchgoers. Roisin Ni Fiachra Nov 2020 #69
Hope she enjoys the rising deaths with this decision peggysue2 Nov 2020 #70
I'm okay with this. Javaman Nov 2020 #71
about 50% of Americans attend church Marthe48 Nov 2020 #72
1st Amendment Right to Attend Supreme Court Hearings kiranon Nov 2020 #73
Cuomo also banned mass gatherings like concerts and comedy clubs, I believe. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2020 #74
We need to win the GA Runoffs!!!! BlueWavePsych Nov 2020 #76
Let's compare to 2nd amendment 986racer Nov 2020 #77
Can the churches go back to burning "witches" and various things against local laws now? LiberalArkie Nov 2020 #78
Will they be using their churches as hospitals BlueIdaho Nov 2020 #79
This is why SCOTUS needs to be enlarged to either 13 or 15. cstanleytech Nov 2020 #81
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»In a 5-4 ruling, Supreme ...