Latest Breaking News

They_Live

(3,231 posts)

30. I like the "Hail Satan" suggestion

Reply to Zoeisright (Reply #23)

Thu Oct 18, 2012, 07:16 PM

Oct 2012

from up the thread. "May our opponents perish in the river of fire!"

"We shall strike down your first born."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge OKs use of Scriptures on cheerleaders' banners [View all] askeptic Oct 2012 OP

damn SCliberal091294 Oct 2012 #1

If appealed this will be overruled...... Swede Atlanta Oct 2012 #2

But if some random person in the bleachers wants to wave that sign, that is their business in JDPriestly Oct 2012 #14

Forgive me, but... Orrex Oct 2012 #24

At the hearing set for June 2013, maybe, by the same judge who refused to do it here. happyslug Oct 2012 #26

I'm sure Perry and the other evangelistas eaglesfanintn Oct 2012 #3

They're high school students. They have no free speech rights. KamaAina Oct 2012 #4

The ruling applied to promoting illegal activity, not free speech in general. Posteritatis Oct 2012 #13

I don't believe they have no rights. That's what courts have said. KamaAina Oct 2012 #20

That's not what the courts said in 'Bong hits for Jesus' at all. Other poster is correct. Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #44

Then how does He maintain His mellow attitude? Sabriel Oct 2012 #53

That's just not true. OrwellwasRight Oct 2012 #65

Just what you'd expect from TexASS. penndragon69 Oct 2012 #5

Worst. Cheerleaders. Ever. nolabear Oct 2012 #6

Lions. We're gonna need sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #7

LOLOLOL snort chortle & guffaw........ kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Oct 2012 #32

They'll be proud of their smirking stupid selves.. sendero Oct 2012 #8

I was thinking about Satanic Church stuff.......... kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #16

This actually IS promoting Christianity mountain grammy Oct 2012 #9

I just re-read the 1st Amendment and it prohibits "establishing religion or prohibiting the free 24601 Oct 2012 #29

In my opinion, the corrupt supreme court might rule for free expression mountain grammy Oct 2012 #31

While I value free speech as much as the next guy, my post was that they weren't establishing 24601 Oct 2012 #35

It's my interpretation that they did mountain grammy Oct 2012 #37

And I judge that their intent was to prevent creating an official state religion along the lines of 24601 Oct 2012 #38

When religion is brought into public schools it might as well be an "official state religion" mountain grammy Oct 2012 #41

Christianity isn't monolithic. Roman Catholics, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, 24601 Oct 2012 #43

I'm not sure how cheerleaders scrawling bible verses on banners is tantamount to Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #50

It is not. billh58 Oct 2012 #61

thank you for saying what I've been trying to say... mountain grammy Oct 2012 #66

I admit to having an issue with religion in public schools mountain grammy Oct 2012 #57

You're up against the theocrat apologists. GoneOffShore Oct 2012 #58

Yeah, what's up with that crap? mountain grammy Oct 2012 #67

Religions have to handled gently, like eggs. Otherwise their poor believers are offended. GoneOffShore Oct 2012 #69

You are billh58 Oct 2012 #56

Silly word games. And you ain't very good at it. Here: Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #45

I believe that billh58 Oct 2012 #54

How about cheering for your team and leave your religious extremism at home. SoapBox Oct 2012 #10

Sad that DU becomes a place to call words extremism. I must have missed the part about 24601 Oct 2012 #36

Why the hell would you call them freaks? glacierbay Oct 2012 #40

If they think god gives a shit about THEIR winning a football game, they're pretty fucking ... Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #46

Bullshit glacierbay Oct 2012 #70

So what do you tell your buddies who get shot or injured? Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #71

What I'm saying is who are you to judge what others believe in? glacierbay Oct 2012 #73

These are those huge banners the football team runs through on the field tomm2thumbs Oct 2012 #11

why not suicide please & Start "walkin on streets of pure gold"............ kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #17

so let me get this straight azurnoir Oct 2012 #18

So let me get this straight... classof56 Oct 2012 #28

Does that mean Jesus caused the other team to lose? 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #48

So your Texas tax dollars are now supporting toby jo Oct 2012 #12

But ordering a girl to cheer her rapist does not violate her free speech? McCamy Taylor Oct 2012 #19

+100 n/t crim son Oct 2012 #33

Isn't that what cheer leading is all about? jimbo92107 Oct 2012 #21

It's "free speech" if the federal judge likes it. McCamy Taylor Oct 2012 #22

It's not a federal judge Andy Stanton Oct 2012 #34

That is completely wrong. Zoeisright Oct 2012 #23

I like the "Hail Satan" suggestion They_Live Oct 2012 #30

The hearing is set for JUNE 2013, thus the Court's decision happyslug Oct 2012 #25

I assume it won't be the Golden Rule Anthony McCarthy Oct 2012 #27

relevent case? Mosby Oct 2012 #39

So, does this mean it's now OK Le Taz Hot Oct 2012 #42

One step closer to ending the longstanding oppression of Christians in East Texas 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #47

WHY? tabasco Oct 2012 #51

I'm not sure how anyone would get from "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #49

Right, now if a law were passed stipulating demwing Oct 2012 #52

I suggest you billh58 Oct 2012 #55

That's like responding to someone who supports corporate political spending limits Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #59

No, it is the billh58 Oct 2012 #60

As someone who is not a judge, I do not feel bound by precedent in any way. Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #62

It is your billh58 Oct 2012 #63

What are you even talking about? OrwellwasRight Oct 2012 #64

I stand corrected billh58 Oct 2012 #68

I would amend that to say "not during instructional hours" OrwellwasRight Oct 2012 #74

Chalk one up for Buddy Evasporque Oct 2012 #72