Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

modrepub

(3,494 posts)
12. Previous Administration
Tue May 11, 2021, 05:29 PM
May 2021

sat on this one for almost a year then rejected it when the company withdrew it to await the Biden administration. They (the previous administration) were focused on project impacts to fishing and marine wildlife while at the same time fast tracking oil and gas projects.

These could be game changers if they work. If they do get on line and are profitable a lot of fossil fuel combustion will be threatened with replacement. Mostly the old coal plants in the Appalachian coal fields and any leftover oil-fired units. If all of these projects come online and are successful (operate at a profit) then a lot of the combined-cycle gas units that are currently on the drawing board will probably never get built. This would then have an impact on the Marcellus and Utica shale plays (potentially less drilling and development).

Interesting times.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Interior Department appro...»Reply #12