Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

bucolic_frolic

(43,128 posts)

5. I'm guessing this is a narrow ruling on database access

Reply to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Thu Jun 3, 2021, 02:26 PM

Jun 2021

otherwise, gee, why did he need to know which side she was working for?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. Supreme Court limits reach of federal computer fraud law [View all] Jose Garcia Jun 2021 OP

It's interesting that the majority included all 3 "liberal" justices groundloop Jun 2021 #1

So the 3 'liberals' were on agreement with the 3 Trump appointees Jose Garcia Jun 2021 #2

Probably because the law as written does not make it a crime. cstanleytech Jun 2021 #4

I'm not sure how I feel about this. But I'm wondering when this sting op took place? msfiddlestix Jun 2021 #3

I'm guessing this is a narrow ruling on database access bucolic_frolic Jun 2021 #5

They May Think It's Narrow But... ruet Jun 2021 #6

Wait, accessing the Federal Bureau of Information files Historic NY Jun 2021 #7

He needed money and accepted $6000 from someone in exchange for doing a background check GregariousGroundhog Jun 2021 #8

It doesn't say he accessed FBI files (nt) Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #11

I'm confused. bluedigger Jun 2021 #9

He just can't be charged with that specific crime is what I'm inferring. forgotmylogin Jun 2021 #10

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court limits...»Reply #5