Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Decisions are imminent' on charges in Trump's effort to overturn 2020 election in Georgia [View all]BumRushDaShow
(128,527 posts)4. I'm guessing that is the equivalent to a
"2 minute warning" to the media to be "ready" (for whatever they decide).
As a note - this special grand jury can't "indict". The D.A. can decide to hand selected info associated with the case put together by that special grand jury, over to a regular grand jury to review.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Decisions are imminent' on charges in Trump's effort to overturn 2020 election in Georgia [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2023
OP
"has recommended multiple indictments and her decision on whether to bring charges is imminent."
Botany
Jan 2023
#1
Your advice boils down to: Give up, hand the keys to the Authoritarians, go home. No, no, no. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#9
You called the effort futile. Are you now saying you routinely advise people to do futile things?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#15
Yes. But nonsense needs to be stepped on or it propagates. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#18
I'm not gatekeeping. Nothing I posted said they can't post. I call it nonsense. Poster doesn't
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#24
"Your opinion carries absolutely no more weight". You are correct. But you contradict yourself
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#26
Neither was I issuing a formal treatise. I don't have to and neither do they. :eyes:
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#31
I shared my opinion of the poster's opinion. That's debate. I scolded their opinion for nonsense
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#45
Read the OP. They must be kept sealed because charging decisions are being made. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#10
She has to present the case(s) to a regular Grand Jury and ask them to vote to indict.
Justice matters.
Jan 2023
#16
A President tried to overturn an election and he gets fined? If anyone is going
Scrivener7
Jan 2023
#42
Ditto. Make it imminent as in today. Im dyin' from old age having to wait here
onetexan
Jan 2023
#33