Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
"has recommended multiple indictments and her decision on whether to bring charges is imminent." Botany Jan 2023 #1
K&R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2023 #2
I'm guessing that is the equivalent to a BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #4
As always....I'll have to see it to believe it. LiberalLovinLug Jan 2023 #40
I apologize for my legal ignorance DENVERPOPS Jan 2023 #3
This case is being handled by a county in the state of Georgia BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #6
A state criminal case can certainly go to the US SC. former9thward Jan 2023 #32
I didn't say it couldn't BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #36
No, and no.... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #8
Thx for the info nc DENVERPOPS Jan 2023 #14
Your advice boils down to: Give up, hand the keys to the Authoritarians, go home. No, no, no. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #9
I posed a sincere legal question DENVERPOPS Jan 2023 #13
You called the effort futile. Are you now saying you routinely advise people to do futile things? Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #15
Take it easy, big fella! We are all good people in here. secondwind Jan 2023 #17
Yes. But nonsense needs to be stepped on or it propagates. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #18
No one appointed you the gatekeeper for nonsense Orrex Jan 2023 #21
I'm not gatekeeping. Nothing I posted said they can't post. I call it nonsense. Poster doesn't Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #24
Right. Orrex Jan 2023 #27
You mischaracterize me again Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #30
Thank you DENVERPOPS Jan 2023 #20
You are complaining that someone has asked a reasonable question Orrex Jan 2023 #19
"Your opinion carries absolutely no more weight". You are correct. But you contradict yourself Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #26
The poster wasn't issuing a formal treatise Orrex Jan 2023 #29
Neither was I issuing a formal treatise. I don't have to and neither do they. :eyes: Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #31
Why are you scolding at all? Karma13612 Jan 2023 #44
I shared my opinion of the poster's opinion. That's debate. I scolded their opinion for nonsense Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #45
Impeachments Can't Be Overturned... GB_RN Jan 2023 #38
No, it wouldn't be futile Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #41
thank you Skittles Jan 2023 #43
Saw a blip on the TV machine that MOMFUDSKI Jan 2023 #5
Read the OP. They must be kept sealed because charging decisions are being made. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2023 #10
Am wondering BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #11
Yeah, Smith and Willis ancianita Jan 2023 #22
She doesn't want the evidence to leak to defendents yet... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #12
Possible defendants know what she has. former9thward Jan 2023 #34
She has to present the case(s) to a regular Grand Jury and ask them to vote to indict. Justice matters. Jan 2023 #16
....... trusty elf Jan 2023 #7
Some are saying that really big fines FredGarvin Jan 2023 #23
Yes but a criminal conviction is the important thing FakeNoose Jan 2023 #35
A President tried to overturn an election and he gets fined? If anyone is going Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #42
Wonder if by "imminent" she means in a few days, after a regular grand jury ancianita Jan 2023 #25
like it republianmushroom Jan 2023 #28
Ditto. Make it imminent as in today. Im dyin' from old age having to wait here onetexan Jan 2023 #33
Me too! phoenix75 Jan 2023 #37
I'm glad she's hinting at it ... ificandream Jan 2023 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Decisions are imminent' ...»Reply #23