Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
11. Seems like NC's law violates the interstate commerce clause.
Sun May 26, 2013, 10:12 PM
May 2013

I recall a similar case about wine. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/16/politics/16cnd-wine.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

There, the states trying to stop internet purchased shipments from out of state to their state had the argument that minors might buy the wine. They still lost. I don't see any legitimate reason for NC's law. Tesla services all of the cars it sells--wherever they are.

As the NYTimes reported on the wine case:

Justice Kennedy wrote today that the real object of the Michigan and New York statutes was not protection of minors but rather to give in-state wineries a competitive advantage over those in other states. Justice Kennedy, who was joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, said New York and Michigan "provide little evidence for their claim that purchasing wine over the Internet by minors is a problem."
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Automaker Tesla takes fig...»Reply #11