Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

cstanleytech

(26,836 posts)

23. Recommended but it wasnt required was it?

Reply to AverageMe (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 07:14 PM

Jul 2013

If not then *shrug*
Besides the ones at fault are the ones who did the deed and funded them so if anyone should be sued its the estates of the people who took over the flights and crashed them into those buildings as well as the people and or estates of those who funded them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge to weigh whether WTC owners can seek money from airlines over 9/11 [View all] IDemo Jul 2013 OP

I don't get it sakabatou Jul 2013 #1

I am having a hard time with this too. christx30 Jul 2013 #2

It's not IDemo Jul 2013 #3

Pure and Simple AverageMe Jul 2013 #5

agree. all the previous hi-jackings and they never started to lock cockpit doors! Sunlei Jul 2013 #9

The FAA never ordered it. former9thward Jul 2013 #13

That is NOT the law, the FAA can require something, but that is all happyslug Jul 2013 #22

I don't think that case is a good precedent. former9thward Jul 2013 #24

You missed the point, the case pointed out liability in areas where they was no regulations happyslug Jul 2013 #28

The judge agreed with me. former9thward Jul 2013 #30

But it will be appealed as set forth in the article happyslug Jul 2013 #31

That will take two or three years. former9thward Jul 2013 #32

Recommended but it wasnt required was it? cstanleytech Jul 2013 #23

Seems like an obvious attempt at an insurance grab LibAsHell Jul 2013 #27

I think it should be... SoapBox Jul 2013 #4

The elite suing the elite leads to this crap.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #6

Yes. And let's not forget how heavily subsidized the airline industry is. Another regressive tax. nt adirondacker Jul 2013 #8

Their pilots, flight attendants and passengers were murdered. Their planes were destroyed. Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #7

Property over People every time. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #14

America in a nutshell. Putting the boot to they who are least able to afford it. TheMadMonk Jul 2013 #10

IMO dotymed Jul 2013 #11

If there were any evidence for a conspiracy the insurance companies wouldn't have paid up cpwm17 Jul 2013 #12

lol dotymed Jul 2013 #15

Obviously you've got nothing cpwm17 Jul 2013 #16

Trade links? dotymed Jul 2013 #17

Here's one. There are many just on DU. dotymed Jul 2013 #19

I skimmed the video cpwm17 Jul 2013 #25

"Solidify the myth." Yes, all laws of physics and common sense were broken on 9/11. chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #18

I am aware of this. dotymed Jul 2013 #20

If they should sue anyone, why not Al Queda life long demo Jul 2013 #21

Lawyerz gonna lawyer BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #26

Oh.My.God. librechik Jul 2013 #29