Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren: ‘I am not running for president' [View all]Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)104. we need her in the senate
And Hillary in the white house
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
211 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She needs to be in the White House. That is the place she needs to be. n/t
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2013
#204
If HRC is the nom, she won't stand for anything that Elizabeth Warren stands for.
Ken Burch
Dec 2013
#207
This is only the eleventh or twelfth time she's made a divisive declaration on this topic.
MADem
Dec 2013
#5
When I have pointed out the fact that she's made "decisive" (heh heh) comments previously, I've
MADem
Dec 2013
#21
Anyone who's been onboard for the past 10 years is well aware of this cycle.
Old and In the Way
Dec 2013
#26
so no evidence of a "wave of backlash" should the democrats nominate one of the most popular women
arely staircase
Dec 2013
#72
ok so you trust a sampling of a few data points over surveys with with many many more
arely staircase
Dec 2013
#94
There isn't a "wave of backlash." Likely voters are overwhelmingly supporting HRC.
MADem
Dec 2013
#76
I suspect a lot of millenials complain, and say they vote "after the fact" but many don't bother.
MADem
Dec 2013
#91
What are you talking about? Rosa Parks was never a senator and she didn't run for President.
MADem
Dec 2013
#115
Your skills at making an analogy seem to be more at issue than my comprehension ones.
MADem
Dec 2013
#147
No I'm not excitable. You don't excite people to want to communicate with you or vote for who you ar
blue14u
Dec 2013
#174
First, it "you're" not "your" and repeatedly flinging language insults at me isn't having the
MADem
Dec 2013
#194
Well, it's "you're"- that's just kind of sad, how proud you are of your grammatical shortcomings. nt
MADem
Dec 2013
#197
I was in the middle of it. I find it astounding that people think that a candidate who was
MADem
Dec 2013
#121
As I said, we see it differently and I don't see much point in going back and forth.
merrily
Dec 2013
#131
"I am not running for president in four years. I am not running for president in 2008."
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#159
If demand is what drives a healthy economy, perhaps demand will help her change her mind.
Scuba
Dec 2013
#6
Bernie Sanders has stated he will enter the race if no one else who is plausible and understands
JDPriestly
Dec 2013
#69
I did not know that, but I think he is more sympathetic to working people than Hillary.
JDPriestly
Dec 2013
#184
Look, ya gotta dance with the one what brung ya. I like Joe Biden, and I understand political
MADem
Dec 2013
#185
There exists a small cadre of political soap opera buffs who seem to be looking for a catfight.
MADem
Dec 2013
#103
Are you gonna tackle her in the hallway and force her to do stand-up interviews for the cable
MADem
Dec 2013
#106
Again, I still think that we need to focus on 2014 and wait until after the midterms before we worry
Gothmog
Dec 2013
#25
She's in Teddy's seat and she will become another Lion of the Senate, or "Lioness" in this case.
Beacool
Dec 2013
#42
Oh, gee, another gratuitous "Waaaah, Obama sux" comment on a Democratic discussion board...
MADem
Dec 2013
#126
i love modulation, and modulars, you should hear the sounds im hearing right now
reddread
Dec 2013
#127
Did he PLEDGE to finish out his term? Did he say "Five words--no, no, no, no, no!" and then
MADem
Dec 2013
#133
Well, we have a little local TV program on WCVB here in the Bay State that no one outside the
MADem
Dec 2013
#139
"I am not running for president in four years. I am not running for president in 2008."
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#156
Yeah, I do--and if you think about it in a pragmatic and non-emotional way, you do, too.
MADem
Dec 2013
#167
Just an observation to those who say she should/might/will change her mind...
brooklynite
Dec 2013
#141
That was a one time fluke. The establishment will be back in charge this time.
Pterodactyl
Dec 2013
#190
Nothing Warren says or doesn't say, does or does not do - will engender any more enthusiasm
djean111
Dec 2013
#210