Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,889 posts)
10. Oh, but she has expanded the meaning of the criteria...why are you splitting hairs
Sat Oct 11, 2014, 07:36 PM
Oct 2014

when the essence is what is important? Do you not see that women's rights and promotion of peace are inextricably linked? Perhaps the original Peace Prize description is from another time, when women were not considered in the original definition of the Nobel Peace Prize. Why are you stuck in the past? That was a different world. Today, we have strong women leaders and now this young girl. What doesn't fit into the spirit of the Nobel Peace Prize with Malala?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Don’t Reduce Malala Yousa...»Reply #10