Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(35,293 posts)
4. Yes, and no.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 07:42 AM
Jun 2015

The "bail out" was to repay creditors. Think of it as "refinancing", and they refinanced not just the principal but also accrued interest.

The creditors had to be repaid because they'd originally loaned Greece money. That money did, for the most part, go to Greece--either paying off interest that Greece had incurred or helping Greece by providing money that it said it needed for other things. Banking liquidity, covering deficits, etc. Some of that previous set of loans also went for refinancing. (Just assume that "refinancing" is always part of the picture. That debt can be paid and a new loan taken out or the new loan can just be applied to the old.)

If you don't remember that there's already a loan, then the IMF "deal" sounds rotten all the way through because, well, "Greece didn't get that money."

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»'No to Austerity': Tens o...»Reply #4