Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: Here's Why Snowden Plea Negotiations Are Going Nowhere [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)30. What does that sentence even mean? Who's "we?" I didn't see you at that hearing.
Who elected you? And if you were an elected official, knowing the answer to the question you were asking, you could have PROVIDED the information to the American public from the floor of the Senate yourself--with no risk of being jailed or charged for so doing.
Wyden already KNEW the answer to the question he was asking.
Wyden KNEW that the response, if accurate, would unlawfully reveal classified information.
Wyden knew he was putting Clapper into a position where he could either
1. Lie
2. Unlawfully reveal classified material
3. Be in contempt of Congress.
Wyden was TOLD at the start of the hearing by the Committee Chair to NOT ASK QUESTIONS with classified answers in open session. Wyden DID IT ANYWAY.
There were two sessions scheduled that day--Wyden asked a question he should have asked in CLOSED session in OPEN session.
What he did was wrong. If he really wanted us to know, HE could have told us all by himself--his speech on the floor of the Senate is PROTECTED; he would not be prosecuted for revealing classified material, even though Clapper would have been.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's a recent web-rumor. I have no reason to suspect there are any serious talks
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#2
Not exactly wild speculation: it points out where Snowden's difficulties
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#16
I doubt that the Chinese or Russians were at all surprised by Snowden't revelations.
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#6
Time and more information about who was placed under surveillance, what the criteria was for
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#7
Good article--amazing how "surveilled" people are on a day-to-day basis without any NSA help.
MADem
Jun 2014
#8
There were whistleblowers before Snowden who told us what was going on. Gore points that out.
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#9
In the world of people who are not partisan. Clapper ran 'round to the political talk shows,
MADem
Jun 2014
#17
In the real world, in the world where people aren't focused on political party preference
MADem
Jun 2014
#20
Uh, so we shouldn't ask any questions that might put wrongdoers in the awkward position of
snot
Jun 2014
#29