process, OBVIOUSLY THE PROCESS IS NOT THE GOLD STANDARD IT USED TO BE.

Stanford received monsanto funding, a lot of it. If the process worked and wanted to maintain respectability, it would reject any studies from institutes that receive funding that cast's into doubt the objectivity of the conslusions. THAT DID NOT HAPPEN HERE. MONSANTO FUNDING OF STANFORD WAS NOT QUESTIONED, AT ALL.

But hey, if you want to reject learning anything new simply because it is not subjectively researched and heavily influenced by corporations that you trust, thats your right. Don't expect everyone else to value subjective evidence as you choose to do.