Video & Multimedia

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)

21. Welcome to DU my friend!

Reply to fpasko (Reply #19)

Sun May 26, 2013, 11:19 AM

May 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

4 Myths about Organic Foods / Healthy Food Secrets [View all] Quixote1818 May 2013 OP

it is also about ingesting KT2000 May 2013 #1

It's also about building and maintaining the soil Warpy May 2013 #2

Still the yields are about 25% lower than conventional farming Quixote1818 May 2013 #3

The stanford study you quote is biased considering STANFORD RECIEVES MONSANTO FUNDING obama4socialism May 2013 #6

I have yet to see a peer reviewed study Quixote1818 May 2013 #9

Why repeat what has been proven to be wrong? If biased studies make it through the peer review facismrising May 2013 #12

While most public attention sulphurdunn May 2013 #32

I garden organically, and I have more and tastier produce than my neighbors who use miracle grow Viva_La_Revolution May 2013 #20

There are over 120 peer reviewed studies here... Veilex May 2013 #22

That's true but quick review says they don't all suggest Progressive dog May 2013 #26

Science is rarely black and white. Phenols have been extolled for their virtues, but some would argue Veilex May 2013 #33

science is usually tending toward black and white, that's the point Progressive dog May 2013 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author Veilex May 2013 #38

Your right, in that science does try to define everything it can (The black and white analogy)... Veilex May 2013 #39

Fact is, since farmers have moved away from organic methods Progressive dog May 2013 #40

"I agree that there is very little scientific proof of nutrients or yield in either direction"... Veilex May 2013 #41

So where's the beef, it's not in your 120 studies Progressive dog May 2013 #42

Um, not quite Warpy May 2013 #23

She is lying! No estrogenic pesticides plus organic food is HIGHER IN IMPORTANT NUTRIENTS facismrising May 2013 #4

That study is bogus. Please post something from a science journal next time Quixote1818 May 2013 #7

Stanford MONSANTO funded study gets in Journal, OTHERS THAT SHOW ORGANIC MORE NUTRIENT DENSE facismrising May 2013 #8

I can't believe we even pay attention to the so called "mainstream" reporting anymore. They obama4socialism May 2013 #10

You mean pro-organic organizations tied the study to Monsanto Quixote1818 May 2013 #11

You like subjective research, the rest of us don't! facismrising May 2013 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Veilex May 2013 #35

your assertions about cattle feed have caused me to conclude you have no credibility for this topic Kali May 2013 #24

organic is non-GMO. Cobalt Violet May 2013 #5

That isn't a winning argument. Crow73 May 2013 #30

This is classic Straw Man* crapola Berlum May 2013 #14

Yup you nailed it! The argument is flawed; Organic is BETTER! Civilization2 May 2013 #16

And yet they leave out important aspects of the Cargill funded study. fasttense May 2013 #15

Her 4 mythical myths destroyed KurtNYC May 2013 #17

yeah - that "pestilized" made me go Kali May 2013 #25

This is obviously not a clear cut black and white issue Snake Plissken May 2013 #18

organic is better fpasko May 2013 #19

Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin May 2013 #21

That Sounds's Interesting. Any Proof of Organic-only at Monsanto HQ. dballance May 2013 #27

Suspicious timing, right after Monsanto March felix_numinous May 2013 #28

Thanks, but Crow73 May 2013 #29

That made a lot of sense Progressive dog May 2013 #31

The presentation is glib and slick..... DeSwiss May 2013 #34

very interesting discussion - thanks to all CHOCOLATMIMOSA May 2013 #36