Video & Multimedia

BillyRibs

(787 posts)

5. Do you Honestly Believe that.

Sat Sep 7, 2013, 09:24 PM

Sep 2013

The scope of this plan has changed!? just because Potus has a 'D' next to his name!? look at how many times he has back peddles about issues he ran on. Open your eyes we can only hope to slow the train before the wreck. With the R it's 120 MPH, With a D it's 70 MPH. either way it's gonna hurt all of us.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

General Wesley Clark saying plans to attack Syria were hatched within weeks of 9/11/01 [View all] Electric Monk Sep 2013 OP

This makes sense warrant46 Sep 2013 #1

"Had there been no oil there, it would be like Africa" tecelote Sep 2013 #2

We'll be going into Africa soon enough adieu Sep 2013 #35

Yes, Clark did his part to expose the PNAC plan BootinUp Sep 2013 #3

Agreed. PNAC's plans were concieved long before 9/11, and GWB was put in office to carry it out. freshwest Sep 2013 #21

Has NOTHING to do with the current proposed intervention due to Assad GASSING children/adults Tx4obama Sep 2013 #4

Do you Honestly Believe that. BillyRibs Sep 2013 #5

Do you honestly believe that Obama is currently using some plan hatched in 2001? Tx4obama Sep 2013 #6

This isn't a CT scheme cpwm17 Sep 2013 #14

Obama is NOT stupid like Bush. Obama is not going approve an unnecessary intervention. Tx4obama Sep 2013 #16

Obama increased US involvement in Afghanistan cpwm17 Sep 2013 #22

Obama said BEFORE he became president that he was going to FIGHT the war in Afghanistan. Tx4obama Sep 2013 #23

Which is very foolish cpwm17 Sep 2013 #24

No, and combined with his Horrible Advisors, including War-Criminal Brzezenski .. HumansAndResources Sep 2013 #31

They all (POTUS)have been squeezing BillyRibs Sep 2013 #36

I think Obama was a plant. tecelote Sep 2013 #9

Better than Bush, by a long shot. tecelote Sep 2013 #10

No, he and Clark are just pawns BootinUp Sep 2013 #17

So, who in Washington aren't pawns? tecelote Sep 2013 #18

+1 840high Sep 2013 #19

Great response, BillyRibs Carolina Sep 2013 #34

Damn Straight! BillyRibs Sep 2013 #37

If it was just about civilian casualties and humanitarian aid, why no rush to intervene in Sudan? Electric Monk Sep 2013 #7

Because America is dependent on war now. tecelote Sep 2013 #11

Oil found in the Sudan 30 years ago caused the civil war. It was well known. freshwest Sep 2013 #32

Because they have no. BillyRibs Sep 2013 #38

Do you really believe there would be so much money, blood and time invested in destabilizing polly7 Sep 2013 #8

This provocation move is called encirclement! BillyRibs Sep 2013 #39

You are deluding yourself because you want to believe in Obama. Put belief aside Coyotl Sep 2013 #12

Actions like going to Congress BootinUp Sep 2013 #15

I am judging Obama by his actions. Obama was the main force behind the Libya intervention... Tx4obama Sep 2013 #20

It's about the nerve gas. n/t. cheapdate Sep 2013 #13

Right. Thanks, Tx4. elleng Sep 2013 #26

Of course it has something do with it. That's obvious. DirkGently Sep 2013 #28

Oh, I thought "WE" (the corporate government and MIC) dotymed Sep 2013 #33

Wesley Clark is also an adminstration spokesperson on the Syrian question. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #25

No, he isn't an administration spokesperson, elleng Sep 2013 #27

OMG gopiscrap Sep 2013 #29

From the 2007 interview by Democracy Now ManiacJoe Sep 2013 #30