Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

immoderate

(20,885 posts)

3. My response was to the content of the video. They appear to have an agenda.

Reply to HuckleB (Reply #2)

Wed Sep 7, 2016, 02:11 PM

Sep 2016

The trailers are most adamant about promoting GMOs. They make slight mention of other issues like homeopathy, thimerisol, etc. Does the film tackle teaching creationism in science classes? I guess we'll find out.

Don't you think that the addition of dicamba indicates that Monsanto's approach is unsustainable?

--imm

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Science Moms Trailer #1 [View all] HuckleB Sep 2016 OP

I wonder if the"science moms" have a comment on Monsanto's addition of dicamba to its immoderate Sep 2016 #1

Ah, so you came by to display the usual anti-glyphosate routine. HuckleB Sep 2016 #2

My response was to the content of the video. They appear to have an agenda. immoderate Sep 2016 #3

Yes, their agenda is pro science. HuckleB Sep 2016 #4

These people are also known as the #Moms4GMOs! immoderate Sep 2016 #5

We already know you don't like science. HuckleB Sep 2016 #6

Has glyphosate lost effectiveness? immoderate Sep 2016 #7

Thank you for showing that you don't understand the topic. HuckleB Sep 2016 #8

What am I not understanding about 'glyphosate effectiveness?' immoderate Sep 2016 #9

Hmm. Giving you links to help you begin to understand is "tap dancing." HuckleB Sep 2016 #10

I said glyphosate would become ineffective. The addition of dicamba validates it. immoderate Sep 2016 #11

You're just repeating yourself. HuckleB Sep 2016 #12

From your link: immoderate Sep 2016 #13

And you continue to show that you don't understand the topic by using a quote out of context. HuckleB Sep 2016 #14

Your attempts at rhetoric are pitiful. What have we established? immoderate Sep 2016 #15

You have made baseless claims, repeatedly. HuckleB Sep 2016 #16

I claim dicamba was added because glyphosate was becoming ineffective. immoderate Sep 2016 #17