Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Progressive2020

(713 posts)
7. Funding
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 11:22 PM
Sep 2017

I think that the Plan and the Funding were split into two parts because it is makes the Bills easier to pass politically. There are two separate Issues: Do we need a Plan/Universal Health Care? and How do we fund it? As two separate questions, it may be more expedient to debate them separately.

Some may agree on the first question, yet differ on the second. Once we all agree that we need and want a Plan (the first Part), we can then work on the Funding mechanism(the second Part). Mixing the two questions muddies the issue, whereas separating them brings more clarity, IMO. If we put the Funding in the first part, disagreements about Funding might block the Bill.

So, first we must agree that we want Medicare for All, and once we have determined that, then we can debate how to fund it. They are two separate questions. Separating the two issues makes the overall Plan more likely to Pass, I think. So, separating the two is a Legislative Strategy to facilitate passing the overall Plan. I think that it is a smart strategy.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»ANALYSIS: Bernie's Single...»Reply #7