Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

Gothmog

(145,086 posts)
34. There were models that predicted trump winning
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:00 PM
Mar 2019

Professor Lichtman is well respected and he predicted that trump would win
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/23/trump-is-headed-for-a-win-says-professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-outcomes-correctly/

The keys, which are explained in depth in Lichtman’s book “Predicting the Next President: The Keys to the White House 2016” are:

Party Mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.
Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.
Incumbency: The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
Third party: There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
Short-term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
Long-term economy: Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
Policy change: The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
Incumbent charisma: The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
Challenger charisma: The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

Lichtman, a distinguished professor of history at American University, sat down with The Fix this week to reveal who he thinks will win in November and why 2016 was the most difficult election to predict yet. Our conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.
Post removed [View all] Post removed Mar 2019 OP
i dont think sooooooooo..... samnsara Mar 2019 #1
hmmmm. Where did I hear that before? LiberalLovinLug Mar 2019 #19
Me neither... not if Bernie's got anything to say about it. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2019 #32
Putin told me sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Iliyah Mar 2019 #2
The Russians are ready, willing and able to help. democratisphere Mar 2019 #3
Barr just gave the russians the all clear to do it again. nt yaesu Mar 2019 #12
With Mueller's help, that slimeball. Wonder how much the Russians paid him. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2019 #33
The betting markets have him an underdog Cicada Mar 2019 #4
You must have missed the last presidential election Snake Plissken Mar 2019 #16
They had Trump with a 25% chance to win. That sounds correct to me. Cicada Mar 2019 #20
trump only won because of russian interference.. samnsara Mar 2019 #24
The interesting thing about betting sites is they can account for Russian interference. marylandblue Mar 2019 #28
Can we please stop hanging the crepe here? Zoonart Mar 2019 #5
Abolish the Electoral College now tomhagen Mar 2019 #6
By passing a law preventing presidential candidates from getting on the ballot unless they provide in2herbs Mar 2019 #7
Taxes should only be part of that resume UniteTheLeft Mar 2019 #22
Are there enough Democratic controlled states for such a thing to matter currently? cstanleytech Mar 2019 #23
Actually, I don't think they can leftieNanner Mar 2019 #31
Is He Indeed Barrelling Towards Re-Election? Vogon_Glory Mar 2019 #8
Economic models point to a Trump blowout in 2020. But a faltering economy or giant scandal could cha Gothmog Mar 2019 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Vogon_Glory Mar 2019 #11
Is Outrage a measurable economic variable? Vogon_Glory Mar 2019 #14
I hope that the 2020 election is about the ACA and health care and not the economy Gothmog Mar 2019 #25
Politico they go from fence riding to right leaning... sad!! Thekaspervote Mar 2019 #18
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it Gothmog Mar 2019 #26
Economic models showed Clinton winning in 2016. marylandblue Mar 2019 #29
There were models that predicted trump winning Gothmog Mar 2019 #34
At least that's a political model but he fudges it. marylandblue Mar 2019 #35
I disagreed with Lichman's model in 2016 Gothmog Mar 2019 #36
2020 economy will NOT help Trump kurtcagle Mar 2019 #38
WTF is this bullshit? Chakaconcarne Mar 2019 #10
Take nothing for granted but this MF'er will lose 2020. Everything he touches turns to shit so no Pepsidog Mar 2019 #13
bullshit - n/t RussBLib Mar 2019 #15
I think w/ the games rump and Barr just played on us in covering up the Mueller report AND... SWBTATTReg Mar 2019 #17
Not gilligan Mar 2019 #21
Bullshit. n/t happybird Mar 2019 #27
How do you get a way with spamming DU ? stonecutter357 Mar 2019 #30
No he is not..and we don't need these negative posts! secondwind Mar 2019 #37
No fucking way! smirkymonkey Mar 2019 #39
If so.... paleotn Mar 2019 #40
Like last time? czarjak Mar 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Post removed»Reply #34