Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
3. That's great, but . . .
Thu Nov 25, 2021, 05:12 AM
Nov 2021

. . . it was the state of Missouri that stole most of this man's life from him. And they should be required to compensate him for that.

Missouri has a compensation law for exonerees, but they are only eligible if they can prove their innocence using DNA evidence. The crime Mr. Strickland was accused of occurred in 1979, when police departments weren't even collecting DNA samples from crime scenes. So to qualify for compensation, an exoneree first has to prove he didn't commit the crime (and proving a negative is nearly impossible in most cases), using evidence that wasn't collected at the time in any case. It's an outrageous injustice!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Missouri Gives Strickland...»Reply #3