Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
4. the 85% is a nonsense figure too though
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:27 AM
Aug 2012

it is padded by fluff in that "the party" votes to name post offices and congratulate the NY Giants and McCaskill votes with them.

And it also assumes the party is always right. Sometimes the party decides to support a bi-partisan piece of crap - like the Bush tax cut extension, or the Iraq War Resolution (although a majority of the House Democrats voted against that, a majority in the Senate voted for it.

So by that measure, McCaskill would get credit for voting (with Republicans and a slight majority of Democrats) for the Bush tax cut extension and Wisconsin's Tammy Baldwin would get dinged for voting against it. Which, in my mind, is giving McCaskill credit for being on the wrong side.

That's who I want her to vote with. Cracklin Charlie Aug 2012 #1
for me it depends on the bill hfojvt Aug 2012 #2
someone at a recent local Dem meeting xmas74 Aug 2012 #3
the 85% is a nonsense figure too though hfojvt Aug 2012 #4
Exactly xmas74 Aug 2012 #5
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Missouri»McCaskill votes with Obam...»Reply #4