Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
United Kingdom
In reply to the discussion: Labour leapt into Brexit's fires - and now the party is burning [View all]Denzil_DC
(7,221 posts)34. I could make some guesses where you might have read stuff like that.
Labour Hame would be one, but there are others. There's a passably vibrant online community who do nothing but peddle these partisan myths.
Check and see whether their complaints include the fact that the SNP-led Scottish Government refused to nationalize the Scottish railways.
It's a good test, because there's no way it could have - it's one of those powers reserved to Westminster, so it would have been plain illegal.
That didn't stop one Jeremy Corbyn loudly banging on about this horrible betrayal of the Scottish people, among many others, on one of his visits up north last year ...
To debunk that rubbish, I'll let Wings Over Scotland do the writing again, because I have RSI:
The SNP are privatising CalMac.
Not true. The SNP are following a tendering process which is required by EU law, and which was also undertaken in an identical fashion by the last Labour-led administration at Holyrood. No decision has as yet been made.
Not true. The SNP are following a tendering process which is required by EU law, and which was also undertaken in an identical fashion by the last Labour-led administration at Holyrood. No decision has as yet been made.
(Calmac - a large, long-established but frequently struggling ferry company - wasn't privatized. It has since won the franchise in the last tendering round. We who live on the coast cheered.)
{The SNP} were behind privatisation of ScotRail.
Hang on, what? Britains railways (including Scotlands) were privatised by the Tories under the Railways Act 1993. The Scottish Parliament didnt even exist at the time.
Privatisation/nationalisation of railways is reserved to Westminster under the same act its totally outwith the Scottish Governments control. Its currently forbidden by law for the public sector to own/operate Britains railways except in emergencies
Hang on, what? Britains railways (including Scotlands) were privatised by the Tories under the Railways Act 1993. The Scottish Parliament didnt even exist at the time.
Privatisation/nationalisation of railways is reserved to Westminster under the same act its totally outwith the Scottish Governments control. Its currently forbidden by law for the public sector to own/operate Britains railways except in emergencies
More debunking of SNP Bad myths (with supporting links) at this unashamedly partisan blog, but one that's wedded to exposing media lies: http://wingsoverscotland.com/advice-for-jeremy-corbyn/
Other of Corbyn's lies in that few second-long clip exploded there: {theyre} also cutting college places, {theyre} also privatising services - and most germane to what you cited earlier, {theyre} also cutting local government funding. To which the riposte is:
In fact, despite having to deal with heavy reductions to its budget from Westminster (10% in real terms since 2009-10), the SNP has protected local-government funding, and indeed just days ago it was shown to have OVER-funded local authorities by £165m in compensation for its policy of freezing the Council Tax.
(Since Corbyn's interview and the above was written, the Council Tax freeze has ended - and this in the run-up to local government elections where there could be a political price for the SNP to pay - precisely to protect local authority funding because it was untenable to subsidize the shortfall any more.)
That's why he can't disappoint me in anything he says about Scotland. Because it's been obvious for ages that he hasn't a fucking clue, apparently has no desire to check his facts before spouting off, and will say anything his daft Scottish minders feed him - and they've made such a success of things themselves.
Anyway, it's less about independence at this point than it is about survival.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not all about Corbyn at this point. It's barely even about Labour any more.
Denzil_DC
Mar 2017
#3
No one the PLP would accept would lead-all they care about is putting a "moderate" in.
Ken Burch
Mar 2017
#6
The "moderates" could stop all of that if they just stopped scheming against the current leader.
Ken Burch
Mar 2017
#12
I don't want to talk about Corbyn or anti-Corbyn either....but the anti-people "Labour" MPs
Ken Burch
Mar 2017
#14
"The best approach was to fight to save multicultural Britain in a post-Brexit world."
Denzil_DC
Mar 2017
#30
In the here and now, there was never any chance that ANY Tory MPs would defy May on Article 50.
Ken Burch
Mar 2017
#32
I've had to knock this myth down before. Sorry, your first argument is just nonsense.
Denzil_DC
Mar 2017
#29