Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ironing Man

(164 posts)
7. to illustrate...
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 04:52 PM
Nov 2015

i agree entirely with your premise - the leader is completely at odds with the PLP, the PLP is completely at odds with the members/activists, and the members/activists are completely at odds with those who, in 2015, voted Labour...

yougov have a good poll from the last week that revolved around Syria/IS - now, i'm not using the Syria issue as the crux of this, but its interesting: its generally assumed that around 60% of the PLP want to support the government motion over IS in Syria. among the LP members/activists its around 20-25%, yet among Labour voters (a vastly larger group than the members..) its around 66%...

in effect, the leader broadly represents the members/activists, while the PLP broadly represents the Labour electorate. Labour got around 9 million votes in the 2015 GE, those who voted for Corbyn in the subsequent leadership election roughly equate to around four hundred people per parliamentary constituancy, or less than 1000 per Labour won constituancy.

the phrase 'cul-de-sac' leaps to mind...

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»the inevitable Jeremy Cor...»Reply #7