Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Treant

(1,968 posts)
1. They're selective polling
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:22 PM
Apr 2016

You ask 1 voter out of every X voters (or every X voters of a certain race, or however they're polling) how they voted, but they're not required to tell the truth, answer your question, or acknowledge your presence.

I've been asked, but always turned it down. I consider my vote private data.

I've also read that exit pollsters won't approach "certain people" who they think look volatile or problematic.

The candidate with the more evangelical followers (now, who could that be in this race?) tends to do better on exit polling. Candidates with voters who can afford to take a few extra minutes will do better than those who can't, if there's a discrepancy in that data.

So really, any split that would encourage or discourage talking to the pollster has an impact.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Who is responsible for ex...»Reply #1