Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

forest444

(5,902 posts)
3. It's also a study in contrasts as far as public works.
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 12:31 PM
Dec 2015

In Paraguay, where the river crested at 7.82 meters (26 feet), there are 200,000 evacuees. http://www.laprensagrafica.com/2014/06/27/paraguay-200000-evacuados-por-inundaciones

In Argentina, where the river crested at 15.86 meters (52 feet), there are 20,000 evacuees.

The potential affected population was similar in both countries. And both countries have extensive, low-lying shores along the Paraná, Paraguay, and Uruguay rivers; but whereas levees and drainage systems protect most of those communities on the Argentine side, Paraguay for the most part lacks these - even along the capital, Asunción.

It would have been even worse in Paraguay had it not been for Itaipú and Yacyretá dams - built by Brazil and Argentina, respectively, and two of the largest in the world.

The key to prevent future tragedies of this scale, given that climate change will probably make torrential rains more common, is effective zoning laws (banning people from building too close to certain river shores) and, above all, public works.

That's what FDR understood, and today there are 50 million people or more in the U.S. (mainly in the South) who are reasonably safe from catastrophic flooding thanks to him.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»170,000 evacuated by unpr...»Reply #3