Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(33,457 posts)
11. Thank you for pointing that out. I didn't notice; I generally assume that...
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 12:01 PM
Oct 2016

...most ACS articles are paywalled, since most often they are.

The authors generally have to pay to have their articles be open sourced.

The Unprinted Journal (Sedlack, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 10775?10776)

With constrained budgets in the sciences, that's I'm sure a difficult sell; although as Sedlack points out it can lead to more citations.

The paper to which I must often refer in my on line writing, since it's so important, is also open sourced, which I find convenient: Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power (Pushker A. Kharecha* and James E. Hansen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47 (9), pp 4889–4895) It's now up to 97 citations, and has remained one of the most read papers (12 month running inventory) in the journal, but I'm not convinced that it's because it's open sourced, but has been successful because it's insightful, accurate, and because it flies in the face of so much public "conventional wisdom," which is not, in fact, "wisdom" any more than the idea that electric and fuel cell cars are sustainable.

Thanks again.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»American Electric Cars Ge...»Reply #11