Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
... is your apparent knee-jerk response:
As is usual, the price of gas is cited as a "reason" nuclear is "not competetive." ...
...But antinukes are very stupid people who don't give a rat's ads that no one on this planet will ever see a level of dangerous fossil fuel waste in the atmosphere less than 405 ppm again.
The original article was published in PNAS or Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
Not quite "antinukes" and not at all "very stupid people".
However, that intellectual level of language has been bandied about a lot lately...along with fake news and fake reporting...now if I could only remember from where I've heard that level of rhetoric before...hmmm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
