Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
3. Who from this article are antinuke?
Wed Oct 17, 2018, 07:37 PM
Oct 2018
The authors are in fact extremely supportive of nuclear and view its loss as a matter of “profound concern”:


The antinuke crowd in question and the authors of this study are quite different. Although there is a relevant argument as to whether the PNAS has taken into consideration the urgency of the conflict between fossil fuel pollution and business interests that exacerbate it. Money dininishes urgency when its overblown importance undermines perfectly reasonable solutions to global warming. The authors do seem disappointed. That's not enough.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»US nuclear power: The van...»Reply #3