Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,585 posts)
5. I've been advocating for nuclear energy ever since the outcome of the Chernobyl event became...
Sun Apr 2, 2023, 09:54 AM
Apr 2023

...clear to me, as it represents, unambiguously, the "worst case" of a reactor failure.

In 2023, with the reality of the planetary scale consequences of climate change clearly before us, the world is clearly redefining what "dangerous" and "expensive" means.

We still have dunderheads who don't get it at all. I've heard, for example, morons carry on, for example, about the "cost" of the Vogtle reactors, a case of arsonists complaining about forest fires, since these same morons have worked throughout their far less than useful lives to destroy nuclear manufacturing infrastructure.

Nevertheless, that infrastructure is being rebuilt under "build back better," and in some cases, being built for a new set of flexible mission reactors.

Probably it comes under the heading of "too little, too late," but it still remains the best shot, really the only shot, we have to save what can be saved, and restore what can be restored.

It is definitely true that all over the world, opposition to nuclear energy, which I interpret as enthusiasm for climate change, is declining, rapidly so.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»French carbon intensity i...»Reply #5