Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Global Community Is to Blame for Palestinian Obstinance [View all]
The international community is disincentivizing the Palestinians from negotiating a two-state solution
Alan M. Dershowitz Nov 10, 2015 10:02 PM
Why should the Palestinian leadership make peace with Israel, when the international community seems willing to recognize a Palestinian state without requiring its leaders to make the kinds of compromises that are essential to a viable two-state solution?
The Israelis offered the Palestinians a generous two-state solution under the leadership of then-prime ministers Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert. Now, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is urging them to sit down and begin unconditional negotiations. The Palestinian leadership have accepted none of these offers, because they foolishly believe they can get what they want without giving what they must.
The major fault for this impasse lies squarely on the shoulders of the international community, including the United Nations, the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, the international media and many individual governments. They have led the Palestinian leadership to believe that if they can maintain the impasse with Israel by refusing to make the kinds of compromises required for a two-state solution, the international community would come to their rescue and impose such a solution on Israel.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/peace/1.685309
Alan M. Dershowitz Nov 10, 2015 10:02 PM
Why should the Palestinian leadership make peace with Israel, when the international community seems willing to recognize a Palestinian state without requiring its leaders to make the kinds of compromises that are essential to a viable two-state solution?
The Israelis offered the Palestinians a generous two-state solution under the leadership of then-prime ministers Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert. Now, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is urging them to sit down and begin unconditional negotiations. The Palestinian leadership have accepted none of these offers, because they foolishly believe they can get what they want without giving what they must.
The major fault for this impasse lies squarely on the shoulders of the international community, including the United Nations, the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, the international media and many individual governments. They have led the Palestinian leadership to believe that if they can maintain the impasse with Israel by refusing to make the kinds of compromises required for a two-state solution, the international community would come to their rescue and impose such a solution on Israel.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/peace/1.685309
Hating Dershowitz doesn't refute his argument which is pretty clear-cut.
All the Palestinians have to do is keep saying 'No' to every offer Israel makes. They'll get their state anyway from the International Community. Why negotiate anything - why make peace? There's no incentive.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
55 replies, 4649 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The kind of compromises that would leave them with a bantustan..he left that part out.
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#3
I know he has no respect for the law, you don't need to be a world famous lawyer to see through
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#5
It speaks to his character, and if that doesn't bother you and Israel can't find
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#7
Majority of what he says is all propaganda, yes. Just as the link supports. People tend to
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#15
Torture is illegal,period, has been for decades. He attempted to make the case from his perspective
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#41
Torture is illegal, period. Torture also doesn't give reliable intel and even if it did, it remains
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#44
I answered you, it is illegal and it doesn't work to ensure reliable intel. EVEN if it did, it is
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#46
You're still confused, the CIA looks and hopes for a loop hole but that would never be upheld
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#51
No, it is not..that is what Dershowitz rested his premise on..IF we have a ticking time bomb, he
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#48
You said it was legal under a ticking time bomb scenario..it is not. You're confused.
Jefferson23
Nov 2015
#52
I don't get it. How would Jerusalem have been divided, and in what direction would it be able to
Little Tich
Nov 2015
#35
No 2 state solution - no matter how favorable to the Palestinians - is possible.....
shira
Nov 2015
#38
You were never for 2 states, right? Also, the Clinton Parameters could be offered again....
shira
Nov 2015
#21
Israel has already offered the Palestinians their own state & peace many times....
shira
Nov 2015
#27
ah the who's fault is it of the week........ last week it was antisemitic Palestinians
azurnoir
Nov 2015
#32
I think the Israel/Palestinian Conflict is more than just about land or religion.
Tony_FLADEM
Nov 2015
#36