Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Showing Original Post only (View all)Debunking the 3 D’s of Israeli hasbara – distortions, diversions and defamations [View all]
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/12/distortions-diversions-defamations
On November 27, 2015, a meeting was held in downtown Vancouver, Canada under the title First Nations & Palestinians at the Frontline of Resistance organized by the Seriously Free Speech Committee and supported by another 10 community groups (of which Canada Palestine Association-Vancouver was one). On the day of the meeting, the local Zionist apologist paper the Jewish Independent ran an editorial Co-opting history, full of the Israeli Hasbara 3 Ds Distortions, Diversions and Defamations.
Their editorial stated: The obvious intention is to equate the history of colonial settlement in North America, Canada in particular, with the actions of Israel toward Palestinians.
Wrong. The editorial conveniently refuses to recognize the Zionist project as settler colonialism, and therefore will not acknowledge that the intention was to draw parallels between settler colonialism in North America and Zionist settler colonialism in Palestine, in addition to exposing the actions of Israel toward Palestinians.
The editorial went on to claim: The concept is flawed at its core, of course, because, as the Palestinian narrative often does, it portrays the Jews as colonial occupiers of Arab land, while denying the legitimacy of ancient and modern claims to the Jewish homeland.
On November 27, 2015, a meeting was held in downtown Vancouver, Canada under the title First Nations & Palestinians at the Frontline of Resistance organized by the Seriously Free Speech Committee and supported by another 10 community groups (of which Canada Palestine Association-Vancouver was one). On the day of the meeting, the local Zionist apologist paper the Jewish Independent ran an editorial Co-opting history, full of the Israeli Hasbara 3 Ds Distortions, Diversions and Defamations.
Their editorial stated: The obvious intention is to equate the history of colonial settlement in North America, Canada in particular, with the actions of Israel toward Palestinians.
Wrong. The editorial conveniently refuses to recognize the Zionist project as settler colonialism, and therefore will not acknowledge that the intention was to draw parallels between settler colonialism in North America and Zionist settler colonialism in Palestine, in addition to exposing the actions of Israel toward Palestinians.
The editorial went on to claim: The concept is flawed at its core, of course, because, as the Palestinian narrative often does, it portrays the Jews as colonial occupiers of Arab land, while denying the legitimacy of ancient and modern claims to the Jewish homeland.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
103 replies, 11151 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Debunking the 3 D’s of Israeli hasbara – distortions, diversions and defamations [View all]
R. Daneel Olivaw
Dec 2015
OP
what is ridiculous is the hijacking of virtually every ProPeace anti-occupation thread posted
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#6
this is getting rather tired but here once again for ninth time is Rabbi Lerner refuting Rosenberg
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#18
that's not what the article says - some of us actually read stuff ya know here is what is said
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#5
isn't it also true that if we were to go along strict Halachic law it is the Matriarchal line not
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#93
I notice the switch off between culture, DNA and religion as needed even in a single post
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#96
well you seem to do exactly what Weiss complains about-conflate Jews and Zionist
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#102
There is no chance anyone talking about,or posting articles about Jewish Bloodlines,could possibly
King_David
Dec 2015
#46
A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages
R. Daneel Olivaw
Dec 2015
#37
If Weiss had said this of Mizrahi Jews your outrage would be understandable and well placed
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#22
Mizrahi Jews could marry converted women of the mideast going back centuries......so?
shira
Dec 2015
#24
What's really laughable is this Jewish "bloodline " thing you're obsessed about .
King_David
Dec 2015
#36
The willies come from the claim that since Ashkenasi Jews aren't racially pure....
shira
Dec 2015
#53
You'd expect to see this type of talk on Storm Front, not a Democratic forum.
grossproffit
Dec 2015
#49
I;m not the one running up and down here going about Weiss's statement being antisemitic filth
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#39
If it's not antisemitic filth, you should have no problem agreeing that since....
shira
Dec 2015
#54
You're deflecting. Do those genetics disqualify Ashkenasi from a Jewish homeland in Israel?
shira
Dec 2015
#60
This is the only thing anyone needs to know about the article and the entire conflict.
aranthus
Dec 2015
#42
agreed except it is in part the DNA connection that forms the basis of the claim not only to Israel
azurnoir
Dec 2015
#66
I don't agree with the arguments in the OP in general, but that doesn't really matter.
Little Tich
Dec 2015
#67
No one here is playing that game. It's your article that brings up racial purity. n/t
shira
Dec 2015
#76
I think she's waiting for 1 of us to agree w/ her first before she calls it racist
shira
Dec 2015
#77