Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

dickthegrouch

(4,672 posts)

7. I agree, the fitting tribute would be a posthumous Knighthood

Reply to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

Sun Dec 29, 2013, 03:29 PM

Dec 2013

I think Turing deserves at least that.

I'm sure an act of Parliament could be crafted to vacate the convictions of all under gross indecency laws. I'm astonished that there are only 75,000 or so such convictions.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alan Turing's pardon is wrong [View all] Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 OP

A pardon... uriel1972 Dec 2013 #1

Yep. It's half measures. Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #2

Stupid! Behind the Aegis Dec 2013 #3

true. they were all innocent. Deep13 Dec 2013 #4

While in principle this is correct, in practice, I'm not sure closeupready Dec 2013 #5

I don't see a pardon as a "fitting tribute." At a minimum, Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #6

I agree, the fitting tribute would be a posthumous Knighthood dickthegrouch Dec 2013 #7

Parliamentarians decided they could not pardon someone for a crime that person had knowingly committ Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #8

Parliament should be lecturing the Vatican about Gallileo, then. closeupready Dec 2013 #9

It is NOT wrong. Fearless Dec 2013 #10

+ fucking 1! Behind the Aegis Dec 2013 #11