Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
5. "Even if a co-owner is sitting in the vehicle, is not under the influence, and is able to drive it"
Sat Oct 26, 2019, 06:05 PM
Oct 2019

That means you knowingly allowed an intoxicated driver to operate your motor vehicle. Why is that not a crime?

On Edit: I don't disagree with asset forfeiture per se, I disagree with it absent a conviction.

I like Ohio's law - they don't impound the car but make them put a special drunk driver tag on the car.

An example of Ohio's Drunk Fuck Plate:

[link:https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_675,pg_1,q_80,w_1200/cwqwqnju8koiuzozq1rt.jpg|]

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Washington Supreme Court:...»Reply #5