Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Action put off on guns-in-parks issue [View all]X_Digger
(18,585 posts)74. Yesterday's SCOTUS decision must have caused your authoritarian streak to squeak, eh?
Police scanning you while walking through a public space, where you have an expectation of privacy? Yeah, that's a 'search'.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It looks like the idea to to make sure honest citizens do no have firearms in a park...
spin
Jan 2012
#2
I find it offensive that you put individual gun carrying above public safety.
Starboard Tack
Jan 2012
#31
My desire is to live in a world where nobody carries handguns in public.
Starboard Tack
Jan 2012
#57
Nice one. With distortions like that, I assume you don't belief in karma.
Starboard Tack
Jan 2012
#56
If it saves lives, we can hire every other person to be a cop and follow the other people around..
X_Digger
Jan 2012
#16
I think you're far too optimistic about this technology, and too cavalier about the BoR
petronius
Jan 2012
#30
"No, but [criminals] should." They will be blinded by the glare of your logic...
SteveW
Jan 2012
#88
If it's not firearms it'll just be something else. So really, a better solution would
petronius
Jan 2012
#92
And how is that surveillance going to stop someone from taking a gun into a park?
rl6214
Jan 2012
#80
So you support a surveillance state? Patriot Act didn't go far enough for you? nt
hack89
Jan 2012
#43
Which means that in public places citizens are been surveilled by the government
hack89
Jan 2012
#65
Yesterday's SCOTUS decision must have caused your authoritarian streak to squeak, eh?
X_Digger
Jan 2012
#74
"secure in their persons" - ring a bell? -- fuck that anti-4th amendment noise.
X_Digger
Jan 2012
#81
If you can not see the difference between a camera (and I oppose those, by the way)....
PavePusher
Jan 2012
#93
How many crimes do you think get committed in those parks now? Not many and certainly not enough
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#44
Oh, God, the "we can't afford it" arguement . . . . . .so often used by right wing obstructionists.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#45